Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Say a planet (mass $m$) is orbiting a star (mass $M$) in a perfect circle, so it is in circular motion.

$F=ma$ and the gravitational force between two masses $F=\frac{GMm}{r^2}$ so



And in circular motion $a=\frac{v^2}{r}$ so



And gravitational potential $V=-\frac{GM}{r}$

So $v^2=-V$

Is there a (qualitative/less math/wordy) reason why this is the case? (or have I got this wrong?) and is this limited to the specific case of perfect circular motion?

share|cite|improve this question

You've just stumbled on the virial theorem.

It basically states that in a bound system, the average of the potential energy $V$ is related to the average of the kinetic energy $T$ like $$\frac{\langle V \rangle}{2} = - \langle T\rangle$$ where the angular brackets indicate a time average.

Note that the formula above is specific only to a potential that goes as $1/r$. As the above Wikipedia link points out, the more general formula is given as $$ \frac{n\langle V \rangle}{2} = \langle T\rangle$$ for any potential that goes as $r^n$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Note that stable orbits only exist for $n=1$ (though bound states can obviously still exist) – Jerry Schirmer Jul 29 '13 at 19:42
Meant to say $n=-1$ and $n=2$ – Jerry Schirmer Jul 29 '13 at 19:48
@JerrySchirmer I guess you meant exactly closed orbits (cf Betrand's Theorem) ? The class of power-law central potentials leading to stable orbits is much larger, isn't it ? – jibe Dec 19 '14 at 22:19
@jibe: yes. THat's fair. – Jerry Schirmer Dec 19 '14 at 22:28

Gravitational potential energy $U$ is measured in joules and is proportional to the particle mass $m$. When you multiply your $v^2 = -\frac{GM}{r}$ by $m$, you can obtain that the particle kinetic energy is 1/2 of the potential energy $U$. It is OK for a bound state. See the virial theorem.

share|cite|improve this answer

the reason gravitational potential V=-GM/r is negative is couse it is measured along the vector that has origin in the infinity towards center of (earth's) masses. So the vector is -r. Resulting gravitational potential vector is V=-GM/r*(-r). Speed is vector aswell. so v=sqrt(V). At least that is how i see that problem. If i am wrong pls let me know.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.