Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I wonder if the following 2 PDEs are equivalent:

  1. $$\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\psi(\vec{r},t)-c(\vec{r})^2\nabla^2\psi(\vec{r},t)=s(\vec{r})\delta'(t)$$ subjects to zero initial conditions $$\psi(\vec{r},0)=0, \quad \left.\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\psi(\vec{r},t)\right|_{t=0}=0,$$ where $\delta'(t)$ denotes the derivative of Dirac delta function.

  2. $$\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\psi(\vec{r},t)-c(\vec{r})^2\nabla^2\psi(\vec{r},t)=0$$ subjects to initial conditions $$\psi(\vec{r},0)=s(\vec{r}), \quad \left.\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\psi(\vec{r},t)\right|_{t=0}=0$$

I don't how to prove or disprove it. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks!

share|improve this question
1  
what do you mean by equivalent? The initial conditions for $\psi(\vec r,0)$ are different provided $s\not \equiv 0,$ so there exists no function that solves both of them –  Lacek Jan 9 '13 at 8:22
    
Possibly better suited for Math.SE. –  Qmechanic Jan 9 '13 at 14:26
    
@Lacek Equivalence means they have the same solution. –  chaohuang Jan 9 '13 at 16:11
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I would say the initial conditions are technically the same for the two PDEs, but the PDEs are indeed inequivalent if $s$ does not vanish identically: while $\psi(\overrightarrow{r},t)\equiv 0$ is a solution of the second PDE, it is not a solution of the first PDE. To get the solution of the first PDE, you may wish to use Fourier transform in space and Laplace transform in time.

EDIT (01/12/2012) I misread the initial conditions, so the above is wrong, and I apologize. You can prove that the PDEs are in general inequivalent in a similar way though: if $s(\overrightarrow{r})\equiv 1$, then $\psi(\overrightarrow{r},t)\equiv 1$ is a solution of the second PDE, but not of the first PDE.

share|improve this answer
1  
how is it possible that $\psi(vec r, t)$ can be both equal to $s(\vec r)$ and on the other hand to zero? Except for $s=0$ that is... –  Lacek Jan 9 '13 at 17:08
    
@Lacek: I am not sure such reasoning is appropriate here. Indeed, there is a distribution (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_%28mathematics%29 ) in the right-hand side of the first PDE, so it is reasonable to expect that the solution will be a distribution, not a function. A distribution does not have to be defined everywhere, we just need that its products with "decent" functions are integrable. Or maybe I misunderstood you? –  akhmeteli Jan 10 '13 at 2:44
    
yes, my argument is only applicable to functions. Nevertheless what sort of behaviour is to expect around $t=0$? I think that this is just a "step" of height $s(\vec r)$, then $t$-derivative gives $\delta(t) s(r)$, second derivative gives $\delta'(t)s(r)$. The second equation would give the same if we assumed additionally that $\psi(t<0,\vec r)=0$. I guess then the solution may in fact be just a discontinous function around $t=0$ (and of course a distribution by local integrability). The problem is the second equation does not gieanything special about $t<0$ –  Lacek Jan 11 '13 at 9:25
    
@Lacek: I stand corrected. Please see the edit to my answer. –  akhmeteli Jan 12 '13 at 8:51
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.