Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a halogen light with a tungsten filament. It is rated 500w at 130v but I am running it from an inverter in my car that is putting out 110v. I would like to know what the actual power usage of this lamp is at 110v.

When I was a Sophomore in high school I had a physics lab where I calculated the temperature of a tungsten filament by measuring the current and then doing some calculation-which I can't pull out of my brain at the moment.

I am guessing that I am not the first person to do this and there must be some sort of curve that plots the current vs voltage of a halogen. If anyone knows of such a graph - or better yet some equations I could use to solve for an exact number, I would appreciate it.

EDIT: Ok, so I answered my original question, but if someone can give me actual equations instead of the mediocre graphs I found, I would be happy.

share|improve this question
    
The question(v2) is possibly better suited for electronics.stackexchange.com –  Qmechanic Jan 7 '13 at 8:14
add comment

1 Answer

After posting this I poked around the internet and found a PDF all about halogens that included some graphs. None of the graphs were voltage vs current, but I did find a graph that was voltage vs flux, as well as power vs flux. Using those two graphs I was able to find that find the actual power of my light.

Here are the two graphs that I found. I drew some lines on them (the black lines) to help me find the values I was looking for because it was hard to read them. Using the data from these graphs, assuming it's accurate, my halogen is using about 88% of it's 500w rating which is 440w.

enter image description here enter image description here

share|improve this answer
    
Resistivity of Tungsten is highly dependent on operating temperature. When you reduce your voltage, temperature of the filament also drops, and thus lamp impedance, which messes the possibility of using any simple formula. I am afraid you are going to have to go with your graphs. –  Jaime Jan 7 '13 at 7:38
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.