Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there any link between the law of maximum entropy and the principle of least action. Is it possible to derive one from the other ?

share|improve this question
    
This is annoying! It seems to be a very good question and we have two conflicting answers with same points; and yet, the question seems to have lost interest :( Someone please start a bounty, please. –  mehfoos Jul 23 '13 at 16:33
    
some related links, here and Jaynes's maxent and action, also check the generalised formulations of entropy (2dd law) for both equilibrium and non-quilibrium thermodynamics –  Nikos M. Jun 17 at 17:21
add comment

3 Answers 3

This old russian paper seemed to have discussed the problem without going much into non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. I haven't read the entire thing. Soviet Physics Journal May 1991, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 426-431. Moslov is the author. Check out their other papers too.

share|improve this answer
add comment

"Entropy" and "action" are two entirely different concepts. The first relates to a coarse-grained statistical description of a physical system at macroscopic scales, the latter to the underlying deterministic microscopic dynamics exhibited by the system.

Also note that: 1) the second law of thermodynamics tells us entropy doesn't decrease, it need not increase and certainly can attain non-maximal values, and 2) action is stationary and not necessarily minimal or maximal. Hence, when considered as fundamental physics laws, both 'maximal entropy' and the 'principle of least action' are misnomers.

Zooming in to the core of your question: 'entropy increase' and 'action stationarity' are unrelated, and even incompatible. One certainly can not be derived from the other. This is for the simple reason that 'action stationarity' describes a reversible physics, while 'entropy increase' presents us with an irreversible picture of evolution of physical systems. The difference, again, is in microscopic versus macroscopic.

As an analogy, think about two statements one can make about the physics of pool billiard. The first being that the balls collide according to Newtons laws which can be expressed by stating that the detailed balls trajectories render a quantity called 'action' stationary. The second being the coarse-grained statistical statement that as long as balls aren't pocketed yet, the mean distance between the balls doesn't decrease. Both statements are unrelated and apply to a description of pool billiard at different levels.

share|improve this answer
    
There are many issues in this answer. For instance, it confounds the general concept of "entropy" with the approx. macroscopic entropy used in classical thermodynamics. The entropies used in nanothermodynamics, thermodynamics of small systems and in quantum thermodynamics are not defined "at macroscopic scales"... –  juanrga Dec 30 '12 at 14:15
    
Not sure what exact problems you have with my answer. Reading it again, I have used the oportunity to expand it significantly. Let me know in case you believe anything in my answer is incorrect or didactically sub-optimal. –  Johannes Dec 30 '12 at 16:51
    
As said "there are many" I gave one example in my previous post, which you have ignored. Your edit adds more misunderstandings and false statements. E.g., your recent "the second law of thermodynamics tells us entropy doesn't decrease" is a typical misunderstanding of the second law repeated by anti-evolucionists for instance... –  juanrga Dec 31 '12 at 11:59
3  
Let's stick to physics and avoid biased views and crackpottery. –  Johannes Jan 1 '13 at 9:36
add comment

Yes, there is a link, both are examples of extremum principles. And yes it is possible to derive the principle of least action from the law of maximum entropy. The derivation is lengthy and I will only sketch the main steps needed:

  1. We start from the law of maximum entropy $dS/dt \geq 0$. As we know this law is only valid for isolated systems [i]. For dissipative systems $dS/dt > 0$, the evolution is irreversible and cannot be described by an action principle. We must consider non-dissipative systems, for which $dS/dt = 0$. This is correct because the action principles are rigorously restricted [ii] to Nondissipative Systems.

  2. From the phase space structure we can show that the phase space state $\rho$ satisfies the equation $d\rho/dt = \partial\rho/\partial t - \mathcal{L}\rho$, where $\mathcal{L}$ is the Liouvillian.

  3. From the constancy of entropy (1), we can derive the Liouville theorem $d\rho/dt=0$, using the Gibbs relation $S=S(\rho)$. This implies that the general equation of motion (2) reduces to the Liouville equation $\partial\rho/\partial t = \mathcal{L}\rho$. Effectively, this equation is not dissipative and conserves entropy.

  4. For a mechanical system in a pure state, the phase space state is given by the well-known product of Dirac deltas; substituting this $\rho_\mathrm{pure}$ on the Liouville equation, the equation reduces to the Hamilton equations of motion: $dq/dt = \partial H / \partial p$ and $dp/dt = -\partial H / \partial q$.

  5. Using the Hamilton Jacobi method, the Hamilton equations of motion can be written again as a single equation: the Hamilton Jacobi equation $H + \partial A / \partial t = 0$, where $A$ is the action [iii].

  6. It can be shown that the Hamilton Jacobi equation "is an equivalent expression of an integral minimization problem such as Hamilton's principle", and Hamilton's principle is just the Hamiltonian version of the principle of least action. In other words, solving the Hamilton Jacobi equation one obtains the action $A$ and this automatically satisfies the principle of least action $\delta A=0$.

  7. Other versions of the principle of least action can be obtained from here. For instance, the Lagrangian version of the principle can be obtained using a Legendre transformation for deriving the Lagrangian $L = pv - H$. In this case, the action is given by $A=\int L dt$.

[i] For non-isolated system entropy can increase, decrease or remain constant.

[ii] As reported in the Scholarpedia link there are some few special dissipative systems which can be described by an action principle. Those are open systems for which the production of entropy is compensated by an external flow of entropy to give a zero total variation $dS=d_iS+d_eS=0$. Moreover, the action principle only describes the average behaviour of these systems, but not the thermal fluctuations.

[iii] References on mechanics usually denote the action by $S$, but here it would be confused with entropy.

share|improve this answer
1  
I don't know how you derive Liouville's Theorem from the constancy of the entropy. Further, you have already limited the discussion to an isolated system and the entropy is more general than that. –  Paul J. Gans Dec 26 '12 at 19:51
1  
@juanrga: Both your accounts are unregistered. You may need to add a login (click "my logins" on your profile) to make it a registered account. Unregistered accounts expire with the browser session. If you want your accounts to be merged, add "merge with <X>" on both profile pages –  Manishearth Dec 26 '12 at 20:36
1  
@PaulJ.Gans $dS/dt = -k\int dp dq (\ln \rho + 1) d\rho/dt$. Yes I limited the discussion to isolated systems, because the OP asked for derivation from "the law of maximum entropy" –  juanrga Dec 27 '12 at 19:09
1  
Technically everything seems to be correct and indeed answers half of the OP's question. –  Yrogirg Dec 30 '12 at 17:52
1  
@Yrogirg Good point! From the analysis of the total differential $d\rho$ in phase space one finds that the $\mathcal L \rho$ is a flow term in phase space. This flow involves a function $H(p,q;t)$ that resembles the Hamiltonian of Hamiltonian mechanics $H(p(t),q(t))$, but is not exactly it. The correct term is Liouvillian mechanics. Hamiltonian mechanics is obtained as a special case when $H(p(t),q(t)) = \langle H(p,q;t) \rangle$. –  juanrga Dec 31 '12 at 12:12
show 12 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.