Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm attempting to solve a relatively trivial problem, but cannot seem to convince myself the answer I'm getting is true.

I have two scenarios.

Scenario 1.

An acoustic wave propagates from Medium W to Medium G.

Medium W    ¦    Medium G

Scenario 2.

An acoustic wave propagates from Medium W to Medium P to Medium G.

Medium W    ¦    Medium P    ¦    Medium G

Now W denotes water, P denotes some polymer and G denotes a type of glass. I would think that the transmission from water to glass would be low because of the high acoustic impedance mismatch. I would also think that the transmission from water to the polymer would be high, because of the low acoustic impedance mismatch.

However, using

$$T = \frac{2Z_1}{Z_1 + Z_0}$$

where Z1 is the medium into which the field is propagating, I get that the transmission in scenario 1 is 88.56% and in scenario 2 it is 42.35%.

I using an acoustic impedance (units of Pa.s.m-1) of:

water 1,480,000 
polymer 2,758,460  
glass 23,676,565

Would anyone care to hazard a guess as to why the transmission in scenario 2 is so much lower?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

First, I believe you have a mistake in your equations. The transmission should be $$T = \frac{2Z_0}{Z_1 + Z_0}.$$

The transmission in Scenario 1 is the transmission through the one boundary:

$$T_1 = \frac{2Z_W}{Z_G + Z_W},$$

while the total transmission in Scenario 2 is the product of two boundaries:

$$T_2 = \frac{2Z_W}{Z_P + Z_W} \frac{2Z_P}{Z_G + Z_P}.$$

Using the corrected equations, the transmissions are 11.8% in Scenario 1 and 14.6% in Scenario 2.

I was curious if Scenario 2 could ever give a lower transmission, so I worked it out. If we assume $T_1$ is bigger, we can figure out under what circumstances that is satisfied as follows:

$$T_1 \stackrel{?}{>} T_2,$$

$$\frac{2Z_W}{Z_G + Z_W} \stackrel{?}{>} \frac{2Z_W}{Z_P + Z_W} \frac{2Z_P}{Z_G + Z_P},$$

$$Z_W(Z_P+Z_W)(Z_G+Z_P) \stackrel{?}{>} 2 Z_W Z_P(Z_G+Z_W),$$

$$(Z_P+Z_W)(Z_G+Z_P) \stackrel{?}{>} 2 Z_P (Z_G+Z_W),$$

$$Z_P Z_G + Z_W Z_G + Z_W Z_P + Z_P^2 \stackrel{?}{>} 2 Z_P Z_G + 2 Z_P Z_W,$$

$$ Z_W Z_G + Z_P^2 \stackrel{?}{>} Z_P Z_G + Z_PZ_W,$$

$$ Z_P^2 - Z_P (Z_G + Z_W) + Z_W Z_G \stackrel{?}{>} 0,$$

$$ (Z_P - Z_G)(Z_P - Z_W) \stackrel{?}{>} 0.$$

By inspection we see that $Z_P = Z_W$ and $Z_P = Z_G$ are roots. This parabola is upward facing (positive coefficient of $Z_P^2$), so at $Z_P = \{Z_W,Z_P\}$ it will cross zero and go positive outside of there and be negative between those two points.

Thus the transmission of Scenario 2 will be lower only if $Z_P < Z_W$ or $Z_P > Z_G$. In other words, the transmission would be worse if you put the glass between the water and polymer or sandwich water between polymer and glass.

share|improve this answer
    
If anyone is looking, equation 9.23 in the book available at goo.gl/FSu2j confirms this correction. Thank you david.smith :) –  user714852 Dec 21 '12 at 17:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.