Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This may be an easy answer for anybody. Is it possible to detect if a particle A is still in a superposition via the sending a group of particles B through a box containing particle A?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Not really.

There is Quantum Tomography, but it requires several copies of the same quantum system (that is an apparatus that can prepare the system in the same state several times).

I understand the problem as: You give me a state, I tell you what are coefficients of expansion into eigenbasis. I quess this is not possible. If it were not for the No Cloning theorem, then you could copy the state and do qUantum tomography on the copies.

Again Quantum Nondemolition Measurement does not mean the state is unchanged and in fact this i just an almost perfect projection. There is no hope here either.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for the answer. I'm just a physics fanatic, not much educational background except for books published articles. I was wondering if this is possible, because if so, we would be able to send comprehensible "data" by using probability if a group of particles are in superposition. I know this is recognized as impossible, but just a thought. What if we entangled particles in pairs or groups and separated them. We keep entangled particles here, and others in space. Keep track of which group of particle was entangled in some order, and selectively observe them. Then we can send bits. – TheWino Dec 19 '12 at 19:49
The bits could be 0 for having a set state and 1 for being still in superposition. Does this make ANY sense in the world of quantum physics? – TheWino Dec 19 '12 at 19:50
So it means that you do not need a state after measurement any more... nevertheless 0 for "eigenstate" and 1 for "superposition" is very inefficient, as you map virtually whole Hilbert space to 1, and measure 0 set to bit 0. Moreover I think this is also very impractical in general. – Lacek Dec 19 '12 at 22:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.