Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have recently been looking into the two-time theories and the implied concepts.

For me this seems slightly hard to grasp.

How can I see the basic concept in this theory in a fundamental way based on its implied interaction with normal 3+1 dimension?

I am interested specifically in how gauge symmetries that effectively reduce 2T-physics in 4+2 dimensions to 1T-physics in 3+1 dimensions without any Kaluza-Klein remnants.

share|improve this question
Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/43322/2451 and links therein. –  Qmechanic Dec 9 '12 at 21:24
"slightly hard to grasp." My friend, if you have understood one time dimension, you are already a king among physicists. –  kηives Dec 10 '12 at 1:19
Great comments if someone could combine them into a coherent and collective answer that would be great. If I have the time tonight, I will try to do this myself. –  Argus Dec 10 '12 at 20:20
@Jerry No, theories with two time dimensions can be ok if these are only infinitesimal, such as applied in Cumrun Vafa's F-theory for example. If they were macroscopic there would of course be large problems. –  Dilaton Dec 11 '12 at 17:39
@jerry next time, use the comments area for stuff which doesn't answer the question.. :) –  Manishearth Dec 12 '12 at 11:01
show 6 more comments

1 Answer

In this blog post, a paper that derives by dimensional reduction well known super Yang-Mills (SYM) theories, such as N=1 SYM in 9+1 dimensions and N=4 SYM in 3+1 dimensions among other things using a SYM theory in 10+2 dimensions as a common more fundamental underlying theory.

As can be seen from looking at figure 1 of that paper

enter image description here

As stated below equation (3.1), if applying the method of deriving shadows of two time physics to obtain lower dimensional theories, Kaluza-Klein are avoided.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.