Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is related to my previous question. I assume that the two wires have the same charge density with the same sign ($\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = \lambda$)

If I want to take the same approach, the potential is still the same,

$V = k\lambda \log(1/r)$.

The energy is, I think, the integral over the (second) wire, since this is the direction where I add charges. Since the wires are paralleled, $r$ is constant in the integral

$U = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} l\lambda^2 \log(1/r) dx$

Which explodes.

I actually expect this, since I keep adding charges at a finite distance from the other wire.

On the other hand though, I think there are well defined solutions for the energy of infinite area capacitors which are worse. Or is it only the fields?

share|cite|improve this question

You are trying to calculate the total energy in the electric field, so it's no surprise that it's infinite, since your system is infinite. More meaningful would be the energy density $\mathcal{E}$, or the electric field $E \sim \mathcal{E}^{1/2}$. Same goes for the infinite capacitor, the total energy is infinite, but the electric field at any given point between the plates (and hence the energy density at that point) is finite.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.