Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is this action for a point particle in a curved spacetime correct? $$\mathcal S =-Mc \int ds = -Mc \int_{\xi_0}^{\xi_1}\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}(x)\frac{dx^\mu(\xi)}{d\xi} \frac{dx^\nu(\xi)}{d\xi}} \ \ d\xi$$

share|improve this question
3  
Yes, but if you're trying to derive the geodesic equation, you lose nothing but headaches by substituting this action with $S = \int ds (g_{ab}{\dot x}^{a}{\dot x}^{b})$, where ${\dot x}^{a} = \frac{\partial x^{a}}{\partial s}$, since a minimum of $\int f(x)$ is also going to be a minimum of $\int (f(x))^{2}$ –  Jerry Schirmer Dec 4 '12 at 21:32
add comment

3 Answers

Is this action for a point particle in a curved spacetime correct? $$\mathcal S =-Mc \int ds = -Mc \int_{\xi_0}^{\xi_1}\sqrt{g_{\mu\nu}(x)\frac{dx^\mu(\xi)}{d\xi} \frac{dx^\nu(\xi)}{d\xi}} \ \ d\xi$$

Yes, it is.

The second expression/term/whatever comes from trivially integrating the energy $\mathrm{d}t$.

You can also try deriving the geodesic equation from this, as a fun homework exercise.

share|improve this answer
add comment

It depends what you mean; that is the action of a test particle in a background gravitational field given by a metric $g_{\mu\nu}$. If you minimize it, you will get the geodesic equation. That is NOT the dynamical action for the gravitational field; your test particle does not change the curvature of the background spacetime. The action for the gravitational field the Einstein-Hilbert one,

$S=\frac{1}{\kappa}\int RdV$

where $R$ is the scalar curvature, $\kappa$ is the coupling constant.

share|improve this answer
1  
It is misleading to write $\mbox d^4 V$. That makes it seem like it is integrating over a $4(4)=16$ dimensional manifold. –  Dimensio1n0 Jul 17 '13 at 14:07
    
You are 100% correct. I will edit that. –  levitopher Jul 17 '13 at 20:29
add comment

The end points of your action must be events, therefore must be an d+1 dimensional object. Action must be extremized over all paths that start and end at the given space time points.

A path can be be parametrized by 4 functions of space and time, $x^\mu(\xi)$ of a one parameter object $\xi$. So it would be wrong to label the end points in terms of $\xi$. Instead $\xi$ must be treated as intermediate label to describe paths. Otherwise the functional form the integral is correct.

share|improve this answer
add comment

protected by Qmechanic Jan 4 '13 at 11:07

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.