Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am studying quantum cryptography and I have a very basic question. Suppose A and B share a secret key k, where k=0 or 1. A wants to send one qubit to B. What A does is, if k=1, she 'flips' the qubit (i.e. applies the Pauli X matrix), otherwise she leaves the qubit as it is. She sends this to B. Now B, knowing the value of k, either flips it or leaves it as it is.

I am wondering why this protocol is insecure. How can an eavesdropper E cause problems?

share|improve this question
    
I don't think they can –  namehere Dec 3 '12 at 10:15
    
How is this different from a classical protocol in which the parties flip a classical bit depending on the value of $k$? What is the goal of the protocol? –  Juan Miguel Arrazola Dec 3 '12 at 23:15
add comment

1 Answer 1

I don't know what the point of your question is, so I have two answers.

Suppose the qubit is in the $\sigma_x$ basis. In other words, its state is $$| \pm \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(|0\rangle \pm |1\rangle\right).$$ Then we have $\sigma_x | + \rangle = | + \rangle$ and $\sigma_x | - \rangle = - | -\rangle$, so Eve could measure the qubit in the $\sigma_x$ basis and obtain its state without disturbing it. You could fix this by applying one of the three Pauli matrices or the identity matrix, each with probability $1/4$.

The other possible question I think you might be asking is: why use quantum key distribution (e.g. BB84) when this variant of the one-time pad (aka the Vernam cypher) works fine. The reason is that BB84 supplies a secret key (one-tine pad) to Alice and Bob, and secret keys can be very difficult to distribute while ensuring that they have not been compromised.

share|improve this answer
    
I think you mean $\sigma_x$ instead of $\sigma_z$? –  Juan Miguel Arrazola Dec 3 '12 at 23:08
    
@Juan: (slapping myself on the forehead) yes, thanks. I'll fix it. –  Peter Shor Dec 3 '12 at 23:14
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.