Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When i studyed QM I'm only working with non time-dependent Hamiltonians. In this case unitary evolution operator has the form $$\hat{U}=e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}Ht}$$ that follows from this equation $$ i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\hat{U}=H\hat{U}. $$ And in this case Hamiltonian in Heisenberg picture ($H_{H}$) is just the same that Hamiltonian in Schrödinger picture ($H_{S}$), i.e. it commutes with $\hat{U}$. Now i have Hamiltonian that depens explicitly on time. Specifically, $$H_{S}=\frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega \hat{q}^2-F_0sin(\omega_0t)\hat{q}$$.

And in my problem I need to calculate $H_H$ (Hamiltonian in Heisenberg picture).

I've found that differential equation for $\hat{U}$ (I've mentioned about it above.) has generally solution in the form (with $U(0)=1$) $$U(t)=1+\xi\int\limits_0^t H(t')\,dt'+ \xi^2\int\limits_0^t H(t')\,dt'\int\limits_0^t' H(t'')\,dt''+\xi^3\int\limits_0^t H(t')\,dt'\int\limits_0^t' H(t'')\,dt''\int\limits_0^t'' H(t''')\,dt'''+...$$

So my questions are:

  • Is there other ways to calculate $\hat{U}$, could give a link or tell me about them?
  • If you know form of the solution for my case, please tell me.
  • If you know any articles or papers articles on this topice, please link them to me, too.
share|improve this question
    
Can you explain what exactly you want to do? Generally this sort of problem is more tractable in the Interaction Picture generated by $H_0 = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 q^2$, since you already know the eigenstates of $H_0$. Then you can calculate the evolution of observables or states using the Dyson series, which is essentially what you have calculated. Your perturbation is time-periodic, so you might also find Floquet theory useful. –  Mark Mitchison Nov 29 '12 at 18:32
    
Since your Hamiltonian is periodic in time this link might be helpful : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floquet_theory –  jjcale Nov 29 '12 at 19:51
    
I want to calculate $E=\langle\hat{H}\rangle$ at time $T$ i.e. $\langle \psi(t)|\hat{H}| \psi(t) \rangle$ or in Heisenberg picture $\langle \psi |\hat{H}(t)| \psi \rangle$. For this thing I need evolution operator to calculate $\hat{H(t)}$, as I think. –  Oiale Nov 29 '12 at 20:00
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Yes, you are on the right track. The series you have there is called Dyson's series.

First note that the $n$'th term looks like $$ U_n = (-\frac{i}{\hbar})^n\int_0^t dt_1 \cdots\int_0^{t_{n-1}} dt_{n} H(t_1)\cdots H(t_n) $$

The order of the Hamiltonians is important, since we work with operators. Each term in the series possess a nice symmetry, allowing us to write:

\begin{align} U_n =(-\frac{i}{\hbar})^n \int_0^t dt_1 \cdots\int_0^{t_{n-1}} dt_{n}\ H(t_1)\cdots H(t_n) = \frac{(-\frac{i}{\hbar})^n}{n!}\int_0^t dt_1 \cdots\int_0^t dt_{n} \mathcal{T}\left[H(t_1)\cdots H(t_n)\right] \end{align}

Two things happened: first, we "overcount" by making the upper limits equal to $t$ on all the integrals. This is compensated by the factor of $\frac{1}{n!}$. You'll need to convince yourself why this factor is needed ;)

Second, by this change of integration area we mess up the ordering of the Hamiltonians in the process. This is where the time-ordering symbol $\mathcal{T}$ comes in. Basically, this operator ensures thatthe Hamiltonians are always ordered in the correct way. For instance for $n=2$ it operates as

\begin{align} \mathcal{T}[H(t_1)H(t_2)] = \begin{cases} H(t_1)H(t_2) & t_2 > t_1\\ H(t_2)H(t_1) & t_2 < t_1 \end{cases} \end{align}

Putting everything together we have

$$ U(t,t') = 1 + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-\frac{i}{\hbar})^n}{n!} \int_{t'}^t dt_1 \cdots\int_{t'}^t dt_n \mathcal{T}[H(t_1)\cdots H(t_n)] $$ Frequently, this is denoted symbolically as

$$ U(t,t') = \mathcal{T}\exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar} \int_{t'}^t H(t_1) dt_1\right) $$ This notation is understood as representing the power series.

share|improve this answer
1  
good job, very enlightening, 1up –  Dylan Sabulsky Nov 30 '12 at 2:48
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.