Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Who can provide me some elegant solution for

$$\left[\hat{a}^{M},\hat{a}^{\dagger N}\right]\qquad\text{with} \qquad\left[\hat{a},\hat{a}^{\dagger}\right]~=~1$$

other than brute force calculation?

================================================

O lala!!! Thanks for @Prathyush and @Qmechanic !!! I got the same result with Qmechanic... I think Prathyush's suggestion should be equivalent to the my suggestion of the correspondence up to a canonical transformation. Here is my calculation (I was not confident to post it...)

$\begin{array}{c} \mbox{representation of }\left(\hat{a},\hat{a}^{\dagger}\right)\mbox{ on polynomial space }span\left\{ \frac{x^{n}}{\sqrt{n!}}\right\} _{n\ge0}\\ \hat{a}\left[f\left(x\right)\right]=\frac{d}{dx}f\left(x\right)\;;\;\hat{a}^{\dagger}\left[f\left(x\right)\right]=xf\left(x\right)\;;\;\left[\hat{a},\hat{a}^{\dagger}\right]\left[f\left(x\right)\right]=id\left[f\left(x\right)\right]\\ \left|0\right\rangle \sim 1\;;\;\left|n\right\rangle \sim x^{n}/\sqrt{n!} \end{array}$

$\begin{array}{c} \mbox{calculate the normal ordering }\left[\hat{a}^{M},\hat{a}^{\dagger}{}^{N}\right]\mbox{:}\\ \sim\left[\frac{d^{M}}{dx^{M}},x^{N}\right]=\frac{d^{M}}{dx^{M}}\left(x^{N}\star\right)-x^{N}\frac{d^{M}}{dx^{M}}\left(\star\right)\\ \sim\left\{ \overset{min\left\{ M,N\right\} }{\underset{k=0}{\sum}}\frac{N!}{\left(N-k\right)!}C_{M}^{k}\left(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\right)^{N-k}\left(\hat{a}\right)^{M-k}\right\} -\left(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\right)^{N}\left(\hat{a}\right)^{M}\\ \end{array}$

====================== One comment on 02-12-2012: The representation I was using is actually related to Bergmann representation with the inner product for Hilbert space (polynomials) being:

$\left\langle f\left(x\right),g\left(x\right)\right\rangle :=\int dxe^{-x^{2}}\overline{f\left(x\right)}g\left(x\right)\,,x\in\mathbb{R}\,,\, f,g\in\mathbb{C}\left[x\right]$

share|improve this question
    
I tried to map this commutator to the problem $\left[\frac{d}{dx},x\right]\circ f\left(x\right)=1\circ f\left(x\right),\,\hat{a}\sim\frac{d}{dx}\,,\,\hat{a}^{\dagger}\sim x$ but I don't know how to make this correspondence mathematically rigorous, i.e. to proof the existence of such a correspondence. –  Yunlong Lian Nov 25 '12 at 9:56
    
the correspondence you write is not correct. its something like x+ip and x-ip look up wiki –  Prathyush Nov 25 '12 at 10:12
    
@Prathyush If so, the correspondence should be $\hat{a}\sim x+\frac{d}{dx}\,,\,\hat{a}^{\dagger}\sim x-\frac{d}{dx}$, right? –  Yunlong Lian Nov 25 '12 at 12:24
    
yes with an extra $\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}$ factor –  Prathyush Nov 25 '12 at 14:55
    
I wonder what the canonical transformation is that converts x+ip to x? –  Prathyush Nov 25 '12 at 15:03
show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The standard way is to use generating functions (in this case a la coherent states). Usually one would like the resulting formula to be normal-ordered.

  1. Recall the following version $$\tag{1} e^Ae^B~=~e^{[A,B]}e^Be^A$$ of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula. The formula (1) holds if the commutator $[A,B]$ commutes with both the operators $A$ and $B$.

  2. Put $A=\alpha a $ and $B=\beta a^{\dagger}$, where $\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{C}$.

  3. Let $[a, a^{\dagger}]=\hbar {\bf 1}$, so that the commutator $[A,B]=\alpha\beta\hbar {\bf 1}$ is a $c$-number.

  4. Now Taylor-expand the exponential factors in eq. (1).

  5. For fixed orders $n,m\in \mathbb{N}_0$, consider terms in eq. (1) proportional to $\alpha^n\beta^m$.

  6. Deduce that the the antinormal-ordered operator $a^n(a^{\dagger})^m$ can be normal-ordered as $$\tag{2} a^n(a^{\dagger})^m~=~\sum_{k=0}^{\min(n,m)} \frac{n!m!\hbar^k}{(n-k)!(m-k)! k!}(a^{\dagger})^{m-k}a^{n-k}. $$

  7. Finally, deduce that the normal-ordered commutator is $$\tag{3} [a^n,(a^{\dagger})^m]~=~\sum_{k=1}^{\min(n,m)} \frac{n!m!\hbar^k}{(n-k)!(m-k)! k!}(a^{\dagger})^{m-k}a^{n-k}. $$

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.