Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I once saw a statement about the relation between division algebra(which means you can define a division in this algebra, there is a theorem saying we only have 4 kinds of division algebra, real R, complex C, quaternion H and octonion O) and discrete symmetries, saying that the number of discrete symmetries(I mean time reversal, charge conjugate and parity) is limited because we only have 3 kinds of associative division algebra(octonion O is not associative, I guess the associativity is related to physical operation, since all physical operation is associative, I mean ABC=A(BC)).

This statement seems to be very interesting and deep, however, I don't know much about this. Just want to attract you physicists attention and give some comments or explanation about this.

Thank you very much!

For more about division algebra:

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off topic by Qmechanic, Manishearth, Sklivvz Dec 27 '12 at 16:36

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.