Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A paper from the LHCb collaboration just came out last week, stating basically that the $B_s^0\rightarrow\mu^+\mu^-$ decay matches standard model predictions, and people are already shouting that SUSY is dead. Is SUSY actually in trouble or is it just hype again?

share|improve this question
1  
Related: arxiv.org/abs/1107.3535v2 –  Dimensio1n0 Aug 4 '13 at 2:54
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

It is hype again. Whether such decays are affected by SUSY depends mostly on the masses of scalar superpartners and they have been known to be high enough from other considerations, so existing viable SUSY models, especially those derived from string theory, were predicting the muon pair branching ratio of B-mesons' decays close to the Standard Model i.e. close to the published LHCb observations. See Prof Gordon Kane's comments in this story:

http://motls.blogspot.com/2012/11/superstringy-compactifications.html?m=1

The models that would be falsified typically require either scalar superpartner masses below 1 TeV or very high values of $\tan\beta$. However, for the values of the masses and $\tan\beta$ mostly believed to be relevant these days, supersymmetry is compatible with the result.

share|improve this answer
2  
So all is well and in order :-) After reading Prof. Strassler's article I was a little bit worried ... –  Dilaton Nov 12 '12 at 19:57
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.