Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

First of all, the spatial reflection in even spacetime dimension maps left-handed spinors to right-handed spinors. So there's no way to define the reflection for Weyl spinors.

For Dirac spinors, it's possible.

(4.4) is the most general solution to (4.3) because $$ P = e^{i\phi} \gamma^0 $$ is the most general matrix that commutes with $\gamma^0$ but anticommutes with all spatial $\gamma^i$ matrices. That follows from $$ \{\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu\} = 2g^{\mu\nu}\cdot{\bf 1} $$ So if we conjugate the gamma matrices, $$ P (\gamma^0,\gamma^i) P^{-1} = (\gamma^0,-\gamma^i)$$ we get the same sign for the temporal gamma matrix but the opposite sign for other matrices.

share|cite|improve this answer
But why exponential term in the solution ? Can you show me the mathematics ? – Fahim Sharif Nov 8 '12 at 15:41
The exponential term is just a phase factor commuting with all the $\gamma^\mu$ and cancelling out with the phase factor of $P^{-1}$. – Claudius Dec 8 '12 at 11:32

Just check it directly, using the anti-commutation relations of the gamma matrices: $\{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu\} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}$. When $\sigma = 0$, the LHS is just $(\gamma^0)^3 = \gamma^0$, and when $\sigma = i = 1,2,3$, it is $\gamma^0 \gamma^i \gamma^0 = -\gamma^i$. This agrees with the RHS.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.