Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I study the jellium model: conduction electrons free except for their mutual repulsion. We have the following vertex: $$\hat{V}_{ee}~=~\sum_{k,k',q}V(q)a^{\dagger}_{k-q,\sigma}a^{\dagger}_{k'+q,\sigma'}a_{k',\sigma'}a_{k,\sigma}. $$ One sees that the electron spins z-projections are unchanged after the interaction $(\sigma,\sigma')\rightarrow(\sigma,\sigma')$ (consequence of the fact that the potential is scalar I guess) so or the mediating gauge boson (photon) isn't carrying any orbital momentum or helicity along the $z$-axis which is unphysical but maybe acceptable for a virtual particle, or there is on orbital momentum conservation at the vertex points. This point is a bit messy in my head, I'd appreciate if someone could share his interpretation or motivate the conservation of each electron's spin state.

share|improve this question
2  
There is a sum over $\sigma, \sigma'$ missing in your electron- electron interaction operator. –  DaniH Nov 7 '12 at 19:08
add comment

1 Answer

You're right the Coulomb interaction operator is a two-particle scalar operator not involving spin it must be diagonal in the spin indices of the particles. The matrix element can be intepreted as describing a transition from the initial states $(\mathbf{k},\sigma)$, $(\mathbf{k}',\sigma')$ to the final states $(\mathbf{k}-\mathbf{q},\sigma)$, $(\mathbf{k}'+\mathbf{q},\sigma')$ so that the particles exchange a momentun $\mathbf{q}$ [but total momentum is conserved since the interaction is invariant under global translations] and spin of the particles is conserved [no spin flip].

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.