Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

BACKGROUND

So far I understood that the hierarchy problem was the large difference between the gravitational scale, $M_{pl}\sim 10^{18}\; [GeV]$, compared with the electroweak scale, $M_{ew}\sim 10^3\;[GeV]$.

However, I heard that the hierarchy problem is due to the existence of quadratic divergences in the scalar sector of the Standard Model.

QUESTION

Can someone explain with ease the hierarchy problem?

Additionally, Is it possible to relate both of the above points of view?

share|improve this question
1  
Possible duplicate physics.stackexchange.com/q/43303 –  DJBunk Nov 6 '12 at 19:43
    
@DJBunk: Thank you for pointing out that post. There exist an overlap between the questions! Cheers –  Dox Nov 7 '12 at 13:38

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The hierarchy problem is not only about big numbers, such as $M_{pl}/M_{EW}$, per se'. In fact in QCD there is no hierarchy problem associated to the ratio $M_{pl}/\Lambda_{QCD}$. The problem is actually about the quantum numbers of certain operators in a Wilsonian EFT. The point is that we understand the SM as an effective low-energy description of the dynamics associated to relatively light degrees of freedom. Because of QM, the heavy degrees of freedom that one has integrated out actually leak into the effective description by changing the couplings of the local operators of the EFT. It's pretty simple, by means of dimensional analysis, to see what operators are strongly affected by the UV degrees of freedom that live at the scale $\Lambda$ or above: $\delta\mathcal{L}=\sum_{\mathcal{O}}c_\mathcal{O}\Lambda^{4-\Delta_{\mathcal{O}}}\mathcal{O}$, where $\Delta_{\mathcal{O}}$ is the scaling dimension of the operator $\mathcal{O}$. It's thus clear that relevant operators, i.e. with $\Delta<4$, are very sensitive to the scale of UV physics. Marginal ($\Delta=4$) or almost marginal ($\Delta\simeq 4$) are pretty much insensitive to the scale of UV physics whereas irrelevant operators ($\Delta>4$) are suppressed by large $\Lambda$. Notice that in the SM the smallness of neutrino masses, and the conservation of B and L quantum numbers, follow from the irrelevance of the operators associated to those operators. However, in the SM, the operator $|H|^2$ is relevant and one would expect its coefficient to scale with $\Lambda^2$: a light Higgs and an hierarchically small vev (especially if compared to $\Lambda\sim M_{pl}$), are hard to accommodate without finely tuning some cancellation in the UV. One could solve the hierarchy problem by introducing new degrees of freedom that enforce such cancellation to occur as a symmetry requirement (rather than accidentally) which suppresses the couplings of the relevant operator. Example: SUSY.

bdw, QCD doesn't have the hierarchy problem (apart for the CP-problem...) because of two facts: 1) the QCD gauge coupling is almost marginal so tha the actual scale $\Lambda_{QCD}$ is generated only when the coupling has ran for for very long (that is, for very a large energy range) to get into a strong coupling regime which allows for strong bound states to form; 2) there are no relevant operators that are not forbidden by symmetry.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.