Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are the missing lines in the integration?

$$\frac{\text d \langle {p} \rangle}{ \text{d} t} $$ $$= \frac{\text d}{\text d t} \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} \Psi^* \left( \frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) \Psi ~\text d x$$ $$= \frac{\hbar}{i}\int\frac{\partial }{\partial t} \left(\Psi^*\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x}\right)~\text d x $$ $$= \frac{\hbar}{i}\int \frac{\partial \Psi^*}{\partial t}\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} +\Psi^*\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\frac{\partial \Psi }{ \partial t} ~\text {d} x$$ $$= \frac{\hbar}{i}\int\left( -\frac{i\hbar}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2}+\frac{i}{\hbar} V\Psi^*\right)\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}+\Psi^* \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{i\hbar}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \Psi }{\partial x^2} -\frac{i}{\hbar}V\Psi \right)~\text d x$$ $$=\int\left(V\Psi^*-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2}\right) \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}+\Psi^*\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2}-V\Psi\right)\text d x$$

$$=\left. \left(V\Psi^*-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \Psi^*}{ \partial x^2} \right) \Psi \right|_{-\infty}^{\infty}-\int\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x} (V\Psi^*)-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^3 \Psi^*}{ \partial x^3}\right)\Psi \text d x+ \left.\Psi^*\left(\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} - V\Psi\right)\right|_{-\infty}^\infty-\int\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x} \left( \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial ^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2} - V \Psi \right)\text d x$$

$$=0 + \int\left(\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^3 \Psi^*}{ \partial x^3}-\frac{\partial}{\partial x} (V\Psi^*)\right) \Psi \text d x+0+\int\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x}\left(V\Psi - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \Psi}{\partial x^2}\right) \text d x$$ $$=\int\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\frac{\partial^3\Psi^*}{\partial x^3}\Psi -\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x} \frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2}\right)+\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x}(V\Psi )-\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(V\Psi^*)\Psi\text d x $$

$$\vdots$$ $$=\int \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left( \Psi^* \frac{\partial^3 \Psi}{\partial x^3} -\frac {\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2} \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right)+\left( V \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}-\Psi^* \frac{\partial}{\partial x} (V \Psi) \right)~\text d x$$ $$\vdots $$ $$= \int \left( V \Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x}- \Psi^* \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} \Psi-\Psi^*V \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right)~\text d x$$ $$= \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} -\Psi^* \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} \Psi ~\text {d} x$$ $$=\left\langle - \frac{ \partial V }{\partial x} \right\rangle $$

share|improve this question
    
I can kinda understand that $\Psi$ must be zero at $\pm\infty$ because for the wave function to be normalized it must be localised, Is there similar reason that says that $\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial x}$ must be zero at $\pm\infty$? –  Elements in Space Dec 30 '12 at 6:09
add comment

1 Answer

That's kind of horrible. But in the first three dots, the changed quantity is at least not wrong, as $$\Psi^*_{,x}(V\Psi) - (V\Psi^*)_{,x}\Psi = V\Psi\Psi^*_{.x} - (\Psi^*V_{,x} + V\Psi^*_{,x})\Psi = -\Psi^* V_{,x} \Psi$$ is definitely the same as $$V\Psi^*\Psi_{,x} - \Psi^*(V\Psi)_{,x} = \Psi^*V\Psi_{,x} - \Psi^*(V_{,x}\Psi + V\Psi_{,x}) = - \Psi^*V_{,x}\Psi.$$ The global conjugation flip over the entire integral is itself valid if that integral is real (since $\langle a|b \rangle = \langle b|a \rangle^*$), and we should expect it to be real on physical grounds, being $d\langle p\rangle/dt$. Though why would one want to do anything of the sort instead of directly proceeding to the goal, I really have no idea. In any case, this makes it clear that what's really missing is a proof of $$\int\left(\frac{\partial^3\Psi^*}{\partial x^3}\Psi -\frac{\partial\Psi^*}{\partial x} \frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2}\right)~\mathrm{d}x = 0 $$ or $$\int \left( \Psi^* \frac{\partial^3 \Psi}{\partial x^3} -\frac {\partial^2 \Psi^*}{\partial x^2} \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} \right)~\mathrm{d}x = 0$$ These are also correct for nice enough boundary conditions, and can be shown using integration by parts twice on the first term.

Another method: by differentiation the definition of expectation value and substituting the Schrödinger equation for the time derivative of the state, $$\begin{eqnarray*} \frac{d\langle A\rangle}{dt} &=& \langle\dot{\psi}|A|\psi\rangle + \langle\psi|\dot{A}|\psi\rangle + \langle\psi|A|\dot{\psi}\rangle\\ &=& -\frac{1}{i\hbar}\langle\psi|H^\dagger A|\psi\rangle + \left\langle\frac{\partial A}{\partial t}\right\rangle + \frac{1}{i\hbar}\langle\psi|AH|\psi\rangle\\ &=& \left\langle\frac{\partial A}{\partial t}\right\rangle + \frac{1}{i\hbar}\left\langle[A,H]\right\rangle \end{eqnarray*}$$ Since $[p,H] = [p,V]$ is obvious, it is then easy to verify that $[p,V] = -i\hbar(\nabla V)$, and $p$ is not explicitly dependent on time, so that term doesn't even appear in that case. This scheme can be done without explicit bra-ket notation, but even the position-space integral representation is simpler if one leaves the Hamiltonian as an abstract operator for a while.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.