Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In fluid dynamics, streamlines are defined as line where at each point flow velocity is tangential to the line. Is it correct to say surface of a solid a streamline? On the surface the velocity vector is zero, so it does not make sense to define a streamline.

Another similar situation is when fluid is at rest (no solid surface involved). Can we "draw" streamlines for such case?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The individual streamline with velocity zero may not make much sense on its own, but it often does when you consider the bulk of the fluid as a whole. In the case of the surface of a body immersed in a fluid, you could trace a streamline starting at a point infinitesimally close to the surface, where the velocity would be infinitesimally small, but non-zero. The streamline on the surface would be the limit of the streamlines as your starting point moves towards the boundary.

Such analysis cannot be performed on stagnant fluid, i.e. it makes no sense talking of streamlines in the bulk of a stationary fluid.

share|cite|improve this answer

Yes I think it makes sense when the surface boundary layer is so thin that it can be neglected. You are assuming no drag or friction by the surface on the fluid. Or you are assuming the viscosity of the fluid can be neglected. The boundary is still there because you do not allow flow normal to the surface.

It is not required that the tangential velocity of the fluid has to be zero on the surface, that's just one possible boundary condition you can assume. Alternatively, you might choose to specify that there is relative slipping motion between the fluid and solid along the surface. Then a streamline at the surface is easy to visualize. Let the relative motion approach zero as close as you want to make it, it could be zero.

I think your original question was whether it ever 'makes sense' (or is useful) to consider a streamline on the boundary with a solid. One case would be if the contact is slipping. As a more practical example, consider a physical oceanographer wanting to model the flow in an estuary some moderate distance above the irregular topography of the channel floor. She might deploy current meters along the bottom to get an estimate of the average velocity near the bottom, and then build a model with this velocity assigned to a streamline sketched in to roughly follow the floor topography. Maybe she measures an average velocity of zero, then that could be her boundary condition.

share|cite|improve this answer
Streamlines can be defined inside a boundary layers. I am not neglecting viscosity because otherwise there will be tangential component of velocity at the surface. I am trying to understand if we can define a streamline at a point where velocity is zero and can we connect bunch of such point to form a line. – mythealias Nov 2 '12 at 20:37
Yes you can always specify a surface, a line, or points in your field where a component of the velocity is zero. You have then specified a boundary condition. Then you have to solve you PDEs subject to that and all the other boundary conditions you impose. – Mark Rovetta Nov 2 '12 at 21:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.