Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to determine the expansion that requires using $3j$ symbols; however, I am running into some conceptual snags. First, the expansion produces symbols that have m's that do not agree with the quantum number requirement that $m=-l, -l+1,..., l$. I assume I can simply throw these out. Second, I am determining $m=m_1$ by evaluating $m_1+m_2=m_3$. I will never have a nonzero term because $m_1+m_2+m_3=0$. Can someone explain?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.