Tell me more ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking for the proof that the 1st Maxwell equation is valid also on non conservative electric field.

When we are talking about a electrostatic field, the equation is ok. We can apply the Gauss (or Flux) theorem and get Gauss' law:

$$\mathbf{\nabla} \cdot \mathbf{E} ~=~ \frac{1}{\epsilon _0} \rho (x,y,z).$$

The question is, why when there is a time dependent magnetic field, and then a time dependent (non conservative) induced electric field, the 1st Maxwell equation is the same?

How we can prove that?

share|improve this question
2  
To be clear, Gauss' law is the equation you're asking about? (The 1st Maxwell equation) – David Zaslavsky Oct 23 '12 at 9:15
Yes, Gauss' law for non conservative electric field – Emar Oct 23 '12 at 9:28
Possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/3618/2451 – Qmechanic Oct 23 '12 at 16:23
Hi Emar, Please don't add your user-name to the post. Your user card already displays it..! – Ϛѓăʑɏ βµԂԃϔ Dec 16 '12 at 2:56

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

As you've said, and just to be completely clear, in vacuum (neglecting, in other words, effects in macroscopic media like polarization), Gauss' law is the full, time-dependent expression of what you're calling the "first Maxwell equation."

The "derivation" of the Maxwell equations were originally formulated as differential (local) versions of the well known empirically observed laws of Ampere, Faraday, and Gauss. This is discussed some in Jackson's book ("Classical Electrodynamics"). Also see Griffith's book ("Intro to Electrodynamics").

The Maxwell equations aren't really derived from more fundamental considerations. Their integral form (the "laws" cited above) were deduced from observation, compared with phenomena not originally used in the determination of the empirical "laws," and found, in some regimes, to work.

In the regime of atomic physics, Planck found that the assumed continuous radiation of an accelerating charge predicted a black-body spectrum at large frequency in contradiction with that observed. And this led to a modification of the classical electrodynamics and the advent of the quantum theory.

The form of the Maxwell equations is, however, tightly constrained by invariance under Lorentz transformations. Jackson discusses this in Chapter 11.

share|improve this answer
Then the fact that 1st Maxwell law is the same with electrostatic field and also with induced ones, is an experimental fact? We cannot prove it with computation? – Emar Oct 23 '12 at 19:03
1  
Yes, in the sense that I attempted to describe above. In fact, the induced fields (say by a loop external to the field point) will not contribute to $\nabla\cdot\vec{E}$ since there is no local charge associated with that field. – MarkWayne Oct 23 '12 at 20:20

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.