Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How do you compare astrometric precision vs doppler spectroscopic precision?

In particular will the Gaia spacecraft to be launched next year be able to confirm the existence of Alpha Centauri Bb? I.e. is Gaia's astrometric precision at least as great as the precision of the doppler spectroscopy that was used to discover the planet?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

Ok, I know this question was posted some time ago, but I just found it using Google because I asked myself a similar thing.

First of all: No, Gaia won't be able to detect Centauri Bb. But the astrometric method has one strange property: It get's better if the planet is farther away from its host star (as long as the observational time needed doesn't get too long).

So, Centauri Bb is just too near to Centauri B to be detectable with this method.

But I think the real question is: Will be able to find earth-like planets in the habitable zone with Gaia?

The rule of thumb I know is: We need a precision of 1µas to find earth-like planets in earth-like orbits up to a distance of around 10 lightyears. And as GAIA "only" has a precision of ~10µas it just won't be enough.

The Jupiter pulls on the sun with ~15m/s and according to this 2008 paper (http://arxiv.org/pdf/0811.2345v1.pdf) this corresponds to measuring the wobble of a star at 150pc with 20µas accuracy (shouldn't it be precision?). But we don't want to find a 318 earth-mass planet at 5.2 AU distance from it's star. Plugging in 7µas precision, a distance of the assumed planet from its star of 1 AU, a mass of the host star of 0.9 solar masses and the distance to Alpha Centauri of 1.34pc we get a minimum of ~5 Earth masses for the planet to be detectable. This may be off by a factor of 2 or something, but the general result is clear I think:

-The rule of thumb I remembered seems to be correct

-Gaia is not good enough to find earth-like planets around even the nearest stars, but it may find some Super-Earths

I still think astrometry will be one of the best planet detection methods in the future, but we may have to wait for purpose-built spacecraft to really find earth-like planets. Finding planets is merely a side effect of the Gaia mission. I'm hoping that NEAT (http://neat.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/NEAT-proposal-summary.pdf) gets funded.

edit: I assumed face-on star-planet systems, so matters will be even worse in the real world.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.