Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know how the unit vectors are defined in cylindrical coords. If I have a point P, how do I express it as a combination of the unit vectors uρ, uφ and uz. In the case of Cartesian coordinates this combination is linear. But what about cylindrical coords? Does such a combination exist for them? And, BTW, could you suggest a simple Physics problem where the use of cylindrical coordinates is convenient or, in general, the reason to choose them?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

skymandr has covered a useful application of cylindrical coordinates. There are many problems with this kind of symmetry.

However, I must differ on one thing: the $\hat \phi$ unit vector doesn't enter into a position vector at all. Any general position vector can be written as $\vec r = \rho \hat \rho + z \hat z$. This is because the direction from the origin to any given point goes along only $\hat \rho, \hat z$. However, the vector between two arbitrary points (that is, when one of the points is not the origin) may involve $\hat \phi$.

If you think about that statement even more closely, you might realize the expression for such a vector will be different depending on which point you choose to evaluate the basis vectors (because they change with $\rho, \phi$). This is a feature absent in Cartesian coordinates but most coordinate systems do exhibit this behavior, and it's something you should account for.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is a correct statement about the position vector. 'skymandr' is right about an arbitrary vector, which they appear to be concerned with. So there doesn't appear to be a disagreement. – MarkWayne Oct 19 '12 at 18:14

Cylindrical coordinates is appropriate in many physical situations, such as that of the electric field around a (very) long conductor along the $z$-axis. Polar coordinates is a special case of this, where the $z$ coordinate is neglected.

As for the use of unit vectors, a point is not uniquely defined in the $\phi$ direction ($\phi +n2\pi$ maps to the same point for any integer $n$), but otherwise any point can be uniquely written as $\vec{v} = A\vec{\hat{z}} + B\vec{\hat{r}} + C\vec{\hat{\phi}}$, just as in Cartesian coordinates.

In terms of the Cartesian unit vectors, the cylindrical can be written:

  • $\vec{\hat{r}}=\cos\phi \vec{\hat{x}} + \sin\phi \vec{\hat{y}}$
  • $\vec{\hat{\phi}} = -\sin\phi \vec{\hat{x}} + \cos\phi \vec{\hat{y}}$
  • $\vec{\hat{z}} = \vec{\hat{z}}$
share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.