Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In quantum field theory with a mass gap, why do states in the asymptotic future/past turn out to have a Fock space structure? For a free quantum field theory, that's trivial, but why is that the case for interacting theories? In fact, the more one thinks about it, the less clear it becomes. If the quanta of the "fundamental" field is unstable, it doesn't show up in the asymptotic Fock space. If the quanta is confined, it also doesn't show up. If there is a stable bound state, it does show up. If there is a stable solitonic particle, it also shows up.

I am very aware of the LSZ formalism, but that presupposes the existence of an asymptotic Fock space structure as a starting point. Besides, it doesn't handle stable solitons.

share|cite|improve this question

Asymptotically, particles and bound states in a QFT with mass gap behave as noninteracting particles, as the interaction decays exponentially because of the mass gap. Hence they are described by free fields. The physical S-matrix is between all these asymptotic states, and only these. Thus on the level of the asymptotic states we have particle democracy - elementary, composite and nonlocal (solitonic) particles appear on the same footing.

In particular, soliton states are asymptotically also describes by free fields, though LSZ is not directly applicable. (Textbooks conventionally just treat the case where there are neither bound states nor solitons. This includes Weinberg's QFT treatise; however, he at least acknowledges the problem in somewhat cryptic remarks on p.110 of his Vol. 1.)

If there is no mass gap, the situation is significantly more complicated, because then all asymptotic states describe so-called infraparticles, and asymptotic states are not Fock states but Fock states dressed with coherent states made from the massless particles.

[Edit] On the other hand, unstable particles are visible asympotically only through their decay products, hence are not represented by Fock states. However, in approximate theories neglecting interactions that cause instability, one may regard the unstable particles as asymptotic particles.

Similarly, confined particles are represented asymptotically only through the bound states in which they appear, so they are also not represented by Fock states.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.