Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given an electric charge $q$ of mass $m$ moving at a velocity ${\bf v}$ in a region containing both electric field ${\bf E}(t,x,y,z)$ and magnetic field ${\bf B}(t,x,y,z)$ (${\bf B}$ and ${\bf E}$ are derivable from a scalar potential $\phi(t, x, y, z) $and a vector potential ${\bf A}(t,x,y,z)$),

knowing that

  1. ${\bf E}=- \nabla \phi - \frac{\partial {\bf A}} {\partial t}$
  2. ${\bf B}= \nabla \times {\bf A} $
  3. $U=q \phi - q {\bf A} \cdot{\bf v}$ ($U$ is the velocity-dependent potential)

the Lagrangian is $$L=1/2 m v^2- q\phi + q{\bf A} \cdot{\bf v}.$$

Considering just the x-component of Lagrange's equation, how can I obtain $$m \ddot{x}=q(v_x \frac{\partial A_x}{\partial x} + v_y \frac {\partial A_y}{ \partial x} + v_z \frac{\partial A_z} {\partial x})-q(\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial x} + \frac{d A_x}{dt}) ?$$

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Use the Euler-Lagrange equations (motivated in a previous post of mine). These are

$$ \partial_x L - \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t} \left( \partial_{v_x} L \right) = 0 $$

We therefore need $$ \partial_x L = -q \partial_x \Phi + q \left( \partial_x A_x v_x + \partial_x A_y v_y + \partial_x A_z v_z \right) $$ $$ \partial_{v_x} L = m v_x + q A_x $$ $$ \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t} \left( \partial_{v_x} L \right) = m \dot v_x + q \dot A_x $$

Putting this all together into the first equation and adding $\dot v_x m$ gives the equation for which you are looking.

Note especially that each component of $A$ is a function of all three coordinates: $A_i = A_i(x,y,z)$; the same goes for $\Phi = \Phi(x,y,z)$ (where usually $A_0$ is identified with $\Phi$ in relativistic electrodynamics).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you :) How can I express $\dot{A_x}$? I have some questions.. 1) $A(t,x, y,z)$ returns a 4-dimensional vector and each component of it is function of x, y,z (Is time component function of x,y,z?) 2)$\phi(t,x,y,z)$ returns a number, a 1-dimensional vector that has only one component, function of x, y,z (and t?) .. thanks again – sunrise Oct 14 '12 at 10:03
$\dot A_x$ is simply $\frac{\textrm{d}}{\textrm{d}t} A_x(x,y,z,t)$. @1: Are you sure that your $A$ is four-dimensional rather than 3-dimensional? Your usage of $\Phi$ independently of $A$ indicates that $A$ is only three-dimensional (because oterwise $\Phi$ would be one of the components of $A$). @2: $\Phi(x,y,z,t)$ is indeed a scalar (1-dimensional). Whether or not it depends on $t$ depends on the problem at hand, in general, it does depend on $t$. However, this is not relevant for the Euler-Lagrange equations as we don’t have to partially derive $\Phi$ with regard to $t$. – Claudius Oct 14 '12 at 10:20
I know that I said some foolish things ;) but I couldn't write here before... Thanks for your answers! – sunrise Oct 16 '12 at 20:47

Use the Euler-Lagrange equation:

$$\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial v_x}$$ $$-q \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} + q\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v}\right) = m \dot{v_x} + q \frac{dA_x}{dt}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.