Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Wavefunction in quantum mechanics and locality, wavefunction is constrained by $H = \sqrt{m^2 - \hbar^2 \nabla^2} $, and taylor-expanding $H$ results in:

$$ H = \dots = m\sqrt{1 - \hbar^2/m^2 \cdot \nabla^2} = m(1-\dots) $$

While the person who asked this question accepted the answer, I was not able to understand fully.

Why would $\nabla^{200}$ in the taylor-expansion of $H$ be so problematic (200 can be replaced by any arbitrary number) - resulting in non-locality? Isn't this just some exponentiation of dot product of gradient?

share|improve this question
1  
Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/13624/2451 –  Qmechanic Oct 9 '12 at 18:01

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Non-locality comes from presence of infinite many terms in that expansion. To see that, lets assume we are applying the non-polynomial function $f(\vec{z})$ of $i\nabla$ on any function $\psi(\vec{x})$: $f(i\nabla) \psi(\vec{x})$. Assuming that $f(z)$ is "nice enough" to have the Fourier representation $f(\vec{z}) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d^3\vec{k}}{(2\pi)^3} F(\vec{k}) e^{i \vec{k}\cdot \vec{z}}$ for suitable transform function $F(\vec{k})$. Then:

$f(i \nabla) \psi(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d^3\vec{k}}{(2\pi)^3} F(\vec{k}) e^{i \vec{k}\cdot (i \nabla)} \psi(\vec{x}) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d^3\vec{k}}{(2\pi)^3} F(\vec{k}) e^{- k\cdot \nabla} \psi(\vec{x}) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d^3\vec{k}}{(2\pi)^3} F(\vec{k}) \psi(\vec{x}-\vec{k})$

This is the superposition of values of $g$ calculated at points different than $\vec{x}$. that is the non-locality.

share|improve this answer

It is non-local because the time evolution of the wave function depends instantaneously on parts of the field which are arbitrary far away. In the case of a linearization using the square root you get.

\begin{equation} i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\, \psi ~~=~~ \tilde{H}\,\psi ~~=\ \sqrt{\mathbf{\tilde{p}}^2 c^2 + m^2c^4}\ \psi\ =\ \nonumber \end{equation}

Where the tildes on the $\tilde{H}$ and $\tilde{p}$ defines them as operator. We can use here the series.

\begin{equation} \sqrt{1 + \tilde{p}^2} ~~= \end{equation} \begin{equation} \mbox{ $1 + \frac{1}{2}\tilde{p}^2 - \frac{1}{8}\tilde{p}^4 + \frac{1}{16}\tilde{p}^6 - \frac{5}{128}\tilde{p}^8 + \frac{7}{256}\tilde{p}^{10} - \frac{21}{1024}\tilde{p}^{12} + \frac{33}{2048}\tilde{p}^{14} - \frac{429}{32768}\tilde{p}^{16} + ....$}\nonumber \end{equation}

This series is found to be represented by a finite expression and we can define $\tilde{H}$ as following.

\begin{equation} i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\, \psi ~~=~~ \tilde{H}\,\psi ~~=\ \sqrt{\mathbf{\tilde{p}}^2 c^2 + m^2c^4}\ \psi\ =\ \nonumber \end{equation} \begin{equation} =\ \pm \ mc^2\left\{ 1 + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}\ (2n-2)!}{n!(n-1)!\ 2^{2n-1}} \left( \frac{\mathbf{\tilde{p}}^2}{m^2c^2}\right)^{n} \right\} \psi \end{equation}

Or written out as a differential operator:

\begin{equation} i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \, \psi ~~=~~ \tilde{H}\,\psi ~~= \end{equation} \begin{equation} \pm \ mc^2\left\{ 1 - \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{ (2n-2)!}{n!(n-1)!\ 2^{2n-1}} \left( \frac{\hbar^2}{m^2 c^2}\ \right)^{n} \left( \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} +\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2} \right)^{n}\right\} \psi \nonumber \end{equation}

Applying this type of operator series on a wave function $\psi$ amounts to a convolution with a Bessel K function. For instance in the one dimensional case one can show, using the Fourier transform, that:

\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \sqrt{ \partial_x^2 - m^2}^{\,-1} \psi &=~~ &~~\, K_0(mx) ~*~ \psi \\ \end{aligned} \end{equation}

Where $*$ denotes convolution, From this result then one can derive:

\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} & \sqrt{ \partial_x^2 - m^2}~~ \psi &=~~ &\tfrac{m}{x} K_1(mx) ~*~ \psi \\ \end{aligned} \end{equation}

This convolution means that $\partial\psi/\partial t$ depends on non-local values of $\psi$

Hans

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.