Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $(\nabla\times\nabla\Phi)_i = \epsilon_{ijk}\partial_j\partial_k\Phi$, where Einstein summation is being used to find the $i$th component...

Using Clairaut's theorem $\partial_{i}\partial_{j}\Phi = \partial_{j}\partial_{i}\Phi$, so $$\epsilon_{ijk}\partial_j\partial_k\Phi = \epsilon_{ijk}\partial_k\partial_j\Phi = -\epsilon_{ikj}\partial_k\partial_j\Phi$$

Now here is where I am confused. If the positive is equal to the negative, the value must be zero. Have I adequately shown this?

share|cite|improve this question
Just a note that $\epsilon$ or $\varepsilon$ is the symbol to use for the Levi-Civita symbol, not $\in$ (which indicates set membership). – David Z Oct 8 '12 at 23:21
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Yes, that's fine. You could write out each component individually if you want to assure yourself.

A more-intuitive argument would be to prove that line integrals of gradients are path-independent, and therefore that the circulation of a gradient around any closed loop is zero. The curl is a limit of such a circulation, and so the curl must be zero.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.