Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

New physics is expected at high energies and cosmic rays have high energies, so have there been or are there any plans to put particle detectors in space to study cosmic rays for new physics ?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

JEM-EUSO is designed to look for air showers caused by extremely high energy cosmic rays (>$10^{19}$ eV). According to the website, it will be attached to the International Space Station in 2016.

share|cite|improve this answer

It is difficult to detect very high energy cosmic rays in space. The reason being that to detect them one needs to interact with them. And an interaction is determined by how much material you put in its way. After you interact, you get massive showers of very high energy particles so you need lots of detectors to detect these. Getting big heavy detectors into space is difficult. That's why cosmic ray observatories are down on at the ground since the atmosphere can be used as a natural cosmic ray stopper.

In saying that, there are some special cosmic rays worth studying. One of them is anti-protons. Since these are pretty easy to stop and detect since it's anti-matter (indeed, none of it makes it to our surface since they disappear so easily). The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer has just been loaded on to the ISS to do just that.

share|cite|improve this answer

There are particle detectors in space right now, and many more planned. They not are to used to study ultra-high energy cosmic rays because those puppies are very, very rare indeed.1 Instead they study electromagnetic bands that do not penetrate the atmosphere and cosmic rays a more ordinary energies.

1 Large scale ground arrays coupled with air fluorescence telescopes (i.e. Auger and its planned Northern hemisphere counterpart) cover many square kilometers, which should be compared to the less than 100 square meters size of a large satellite borne instrument.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.