Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Generally, Gamma matrices could be constructed based on the Clifford algebra. \begin{equation} \gamma^{i}\gamma^{j}+\gamma^{j}\gamma^{i}=2h^{ij}, \end{equation}

My question is how to generally construct the charge conjugation matrix to raise one spinor index in the gamma matrix.

In even dimensions (D=2m), consider complex Grassmann algebra $\Lambda_{m}[\alpha^{1},...,\alpha^{m}]$ with generators $\alpha^{1},...,\alpha^{m}.$) Namely, we define $\widehat{\alpha }^{i}$ and $\widehat{\beta}_{i}$ as multiplication and differentiation operators: \begin{equation} \widehat{\alpha}^{i}\psi=\alpha^{i}\psi, \end{equation} \begin{equation} \widehat{\beta}_{i}\psi=\frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha^{i}}\psi. \end{equation}

According to the Grassmann algebra, we have \begin{equation} \widehat{\alpha}^{i}\widehat{\alpha}^{j}+\widehat{\alpha}^{j}\widehat{\alpha }^{i}=0, \end{equation} \begin{equation} \widehat{\beta}_{i}\widehat{\beta}_{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j}\widehat{\beta}% _{i}=0 \end{equation} \begin{equation} \widehat{\alpha}^{i}\widehat{\beta}_{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j}\widehat{\alpha }^{i}=\delta_{j}^{i} \end{equation} This means that $\widehat{\alpha}^{1},...,\widehat{\alpha}^{m},\widehat{\beta }_{1},...,\widehat{\beta}_{m}$ specify a representation of Clifford algebra for some choice of $h$ (namely, for $h$ corresponding to quadratic form $\frac{1}{2}(x^{1}x^{m+1}+x^{2}x^{m+2}+...+x^{m}x^{2m})$). It follows that operators \begin{equation} \Gamma^{j}=\widehat{\alpha}^{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j},1\leq j\leq m, \end{equation} \begin{equation} \Gamma^{j}=\widehat{\alpha}^{j-m}-\widehat{\beta}_{j-m},m<j\leq2m, \end{equation} determine a representation of $Cl(m,m,\mathbb{C})$

For example, in $D=4$, we can obtain $$\Gamma^{1}=\begin{pmatrix}0& 1& 0& 0\\ 1& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 1\\ 0& 0& 1& 0\\ \end{pmatrix}$$, $$\Gamma^{2}=\begin{pmatrix}0& 0& 0& 1\\ 0& 0& {-1}& 0\\ 0& {-1}& 0& 0\\ 1& 0& 0& 0\\ \end{pmatrix}$$, $$\Gamma^{3}=\begin{pmatrix}0& {-1}& 0& 0\\ 1& 0& 0& 0\\ 0& 0& 0& 1\\ 0& 0& {-1}& 0\\ \end{pmatrix}$$, $$\Gamma^{4}=\begin{pmatrix}0& 0& 0& {-1}\\ 0& 0& 1& 0\\ 0& {-1}& 0& 0\\ 1& 0& 0& 0\\ \end{pmatrix}$$

My question is how to generally construct the charge conjugation matrix C, so that we could have $$C\Gamma C^{-1}=+/-\Gamma^T$$

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

Explicit expressions for the Euclidian signature are given in the following Hitoshi Murayama lecture notes (Section 1.3). The expressions are given in the Pauli matrix tensor product basis.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. But they used a different method to construct the gamma matrices. Any idea how to construct the charge conjugation matrix for the gamma matrices given in my original post? –  Osiris Xu Oct 4 '12 at 5:01
    
I can show you how to construct in this particular case, but can you please check your calculations because in your expressions $(\Gamma^1)^2=(\Gamma^2)^2=1$ while $(\Gamma^3)^2=(\Gamma^4)^2=-1$, i.e., you are working in a signature $(1, 1, -1, -1)$. Is this really the case you need. –  David Bar Moshe Oct 4 '12 at 16:06
    
Dear David Yes, I am working with the general signatures of (1..1,-1..-1), where there are m +1s, and m -1s, for the 2m dimensional spacetime. –  Osiris Xu Oct 4 '12 at 21:41
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.