Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is probably a simple question, but what does the subscript $0$ mean in the following expression?

$$V=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{d^2 V}{{dq_i}{dq_j}}\right)_0$$

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

The subscript zero here probably just means either

  1. that one should put $q=0$ after differentiating twice,

  2. or that the Hessian $\left. \partial_i\partial_j V \right|_{q=q_{(0)}}$ is evaluated at point $q_{(0)}$ that is a stationary point $\left. \partial_i V \right|_{q=q_{(0)}}=0$.

One would have to see the precise context to be sure.

share|improve this answer
    
I would guess (2), but yes context would help. I'm betting it's the second derivative of a potential evaluated at the equilibrium point. –  kηives Sep 27 '12 at 3:55
add comment

Usually that means "initial" or if you're in Europe it can mean either "nought" or initial. All three mean the same thing though. An example would be $v_0$ which would be initial velocity.

Edit:

The zero subscript does not HAVE to mean initial. As I mentioned in a comment, we can take an example from electrostatics where epsilon nought ($ε_0$) is the permittivity of free space, not any initial value.

share|improve this answer
    
Even in Europe it means initial. In fact, we are more likely than Americans to use $_0$ rather than $_{in}$ or $_{initial}$, etc. –  Peteris Sep 26 '12 at 4:07
    
Strange. I thought it had something to do with equilibrium position. I should mention that I found this expression in the context of the chapter on small oscillations. –  Joebevo Sep 26 '12 at 4:10
    
@Peteris I'll make the change; I didn't know that. Thanks. –  ThroatOfWinter57 Sep 27 '12 at 2:56
2  
@ThroatOfWinter57 Don't you mean nought, not not? Pronunciation aside, I'm pretty sure the word refers to the zero-ness of the subscript, rather than any logical negation. This is a common misunderstanding though: see english.SE. –  Chris White Oct 27 '12 at 8:25
    
Oops, I guess. It's changed now though. Also, and I just now realized this, but in Physics we have Epsilon nought which obviously does not mean initial permittivity of free space! I'll make a futile edit. –  ThroatOfWinter57 Feb 26 '13 at 2:39
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.