Tell me more ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is this correct..?

Gravitational constant, $G = 6.67 × 10^{-11} Nm^2kg^{-2}$

Mass of Sun, $M = 1.99 × 10^{30} kg$

Mass of Earth, $m= 6.02 × 10^{24}kg$

Distance between Sun and Earth, $R= 1.5 × 10^{11}m$

Hence, the Force acting on Earth by Sun, $F = \frac{GMm}{R^2} = 3.39 × 10^{22}$ $N$

share|improve this question
Corrections are a bit more helpful, thanks. – user12390 Sep 20 '12 at 21:31
Your calculation is correct google.com/search?q=G*%28mass+of+the+sun%29*%28mass+of+the+Earth%29%‌​2F%281+astronomical+unit%29^2 – AlanSE Sep 20 '12 at 21:34
Thanks, wasn't sure from the -1 but I appreciate you letting me know – user12390 Sep 20 '12 at 21:35
2  
Hi user12390, and welcome to Physics Stack Exchange! Generally we discourage questions that just ask for someone to check your work. Once you have identified the specific concept that you're not sure about, that's the point at which it's appropriate to ask a question here. – David Zaslavsky Sep 20 '12 at 23:43

closed as too localized by David Zaslavsky Sep 20 '12 at 23:43

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, see the FAQ.

1 Answer

Well, the numbers you gave plug in to get $F = 3.55 \times 10^{22}\ \mathrm{N}$. That large a discrepancy probably with what you quote as the force probably comes from doing the calculation in stages in rounding at each step. Always plug in numbers in a single step at the very end.

Also, I see $M_\oplus = 5.97 \times 10^{24}\ \mathrm{kg}$ in several sources. You might want to use that instead.

In fact, there's an important lesson hidden away beneath this simple calculation. You may have heard people say $G$ is one of the least precisely measured constants. The thing is, it's hard to design experiments to measure $G$. Conceptually, you want to take two known masses, separated them with a known distance, and measure the force of attraction, just as Cavendish did The problem is that this force will be exceedingly small for any two reasonable masses. You might want to use the Earth as one of the masses, but that begs the question, since you need $G$ to find the mass of the Earth. (A clever way to try to avoid this was the Schiehallion experiment, which was able to say something about the average density of the Earth.)

As it happens, studying the orbits of the planets over very long times gives exquisite precision for a number of parameters, but these are not necessarily the parameters you're looking for. The heliocentric gravitational constant, $G M_\odot$, is known with several orders of magnitude better precision than either $G$ or $M_\odot$ alone.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.