Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm searching for the "official" mass of the sun as a unit in astrophysics. The mass of the sun can be calculated by: $M_{\odot}=\frac{4\pi^2\times(1 \ \text{ua})^3}{G\times(1\ \text{year})^2}$

So in this formula:

$\pi = 3.1415926535898...$

$1 \ \text{ua} = 149597870700 \ \text{m}$ (it's an exact definition according to the IAU 2012 resolution

$G = 6.67384\times10^{-11} \ \text{m}^3\text{kg}^{-1}\text{s}^{-2}$ according to CODATA ( but $G = 6.67428\times10^{-11} \ \text{m}^3\text{kg}^{-1}\text{s}^{-2}$ according to IAU 2009 (, so which one do we choose?

Finally, for the year here, which year to choose? Is it the same year as for the light speed: $1 \ \text{year}=365.25\times24\times3600=31557600 \ \text{s}$ (Julian year)? Or the tropical year $1 \ \text{year}=365.2421897\times24\times3600=31556925.2 \ \text{s}$ (tropical year)?

For some of the preceding values we obtain:

$M_{\odot}=\frac{4\pi^2\times(149597870700)^3}{6.67384\times10^{-11}\times(31557600)^2}=1.988622... \ \text{kg}$

which is not what gives wikipedia ( or google (

So my question is: what are the correct preceding values, and consequently what is the current good value for the sun mass? (as some units may have been redefined since some measurements it's not that simple)

share|cite|improve this question
For what it's worth, WolframAlpha reports a value of 1.988435×10^30 kg (kilograms) – FrankH Sep 17 '12 at 4:48
Worth noting that $GM_\odot$ is known far more precisely than $G$ or $M_\odot$ separately. Thus if you ever need to use $GM_\odot$ in a calculation, computing it from $G$ and $M_\odot$ separately amounts to doing extra effort for a less precise answer. – Chris White Sep 8 '13 at 19:47
Google says the mass is "1.989 × 10^30 kg". Google is always right. – PandaLion98 Dec 15 '15 at 9:58
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The two values for the gravitational constant are both from CODATA. Given the choice of using the old 2009 CODATA value, or current value, use the latter.

There is no official "mass of the sun" in kilograms. However there is an official "solar mass parameter" $ \mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{s}$ (previously known as the heliocentric gravitation constant). This value has units of $ \frac{L^3}{M T^2}$, dividing it by the gravitational constant $G$, gives the solar mass in kilograms.

Wikipedia's value for the solar mass was out of date (2004), so I updated it. The current best estimate is $ 1.98855 \times 10^{30} \ \mathrm{kg}$.

Expressions for the solar mass:
$ M_{\odot}=\frac{4\pi^2(1 \ \text{AU})^3}{G(1 \ \mathrm{Gaussian \ year})^2} = \frac{k^2(1 \ \text{AU})^3}{G (1 \ \text{day})^2}$

where k is the Gaussian gravitational constant. A Gaussian year is defined as:
$ \mathrm{Y}_{\mathrm{Gauss}} = \frac{ 2 \pi (1 \ \mathrm{day}) }{k} $

share|cite|improve this answer

I don't belive there's a generally accepted definition - if so, I've never heard of it. Just take a value from the literature you like best, eg the solar mass at J2000.

Personally, I think that as the astronomical unit now has a definite value, it would make sense to use the formula you gave above as a definition. If one should always use the most precise value for $G$ available or just take the current one is up to debate - I could argue either way.

If you do this, of course the sun will no longer have solar mass, but it's not a fixed quantity anyway and that's not stopped us before (case in point: julian year and astronomical unit).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.