Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are some good books, videos, websites for getting started with general relativity?

Mathematically rigorous preferred!

share|improve this question
    
take a look at einstein-online.info/elementary/generalRT/GeomGravity and other pages on that site –  joseph f. johnson Jan 15 '12 at 2:25
    
This catalog theassayer.org/cgi-bin/asbrowsesubject.cgi?class=Q#freeclassQC lists about half a dozen free books on general relativity. –  Ben Crowell Sep 18 '13 at 17:24
add comment

14 Answers

up vote 36 down vote accepted

I can only recommend textbooks because that's what I've used, but here are some suggestions:

  • Gravity: An Introduction To General Relativity by James Hartle is reasonably good as an introduction, although in order to make the content accessible, he does skip over a lot of mathematical detail. For your purposes, you might consider reading the first few chapters just to get the "big picture" if you find other books to be a bit too much at first.
  • A First Course in General Relativity by Bernard Schutz is one that I've heard similar things about, but I haven't read it myself.
  • Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity by Sean Carroll is one that I've used a bit, and which goes into a slightly higher level of mathematical detail than Hartle. It introduces the basics of differential geometry and uses them to discuss the formulation of tensors, connections, and the metric (and then of course it goes on into the theory itself and applications). It's based on these notes which are available for free.
  • General Relativity by Robert M. Wald is a classic, though I'm a little embarrassed to admit that I haven't read much of it. From what I know, though, there's certainly no shortage of mathematical detail, and it derives/explains certain principles in different ways from other books, so it can either be a good reference on its own (if you're up for the detail) or a good companion to whatever else you're reading. However it was published back in 1984 and thus doesn't cover a lot of recent developments, e.g. the accelerating expansion of the universe, cosmic censorship, various results in semiclassical gravity and numerical relativity, and so on.
  • Gravitation by Charles Misner, Kip Thorne, and John Wheeler, is pretty much the authoritative reference on general relativity (to the extent that one exists). It discusses many aspects and applications of the theory in far more mathematical and logical detail than any other book I've seen. (Consequently, it's very thick.) I would recommend having a copy of this around as a reference to go to about specific topics, when you have questions about the explanations in other books, but it's not the kind of thing you'd sit down and read large chunks of at once. It's also worth noting that this dates back to 1973, so it's out of date in the same ways as Wald's book (and more).
  • Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity by Steven Weinberg is another one that I've read a bit of. Honestly I find it a bit hard to follow - just like some of Weinberg's other books, actually - since he gets into such detailed explanations, and it's easy to get bogged down in trying to understand the details and forget about the main point of the argument. Still, this might be another one to go to if you're wondering about the details omitted by other books. This is not as comprehensive as the Misner/Thorne/Wheeler book, though.
  • A Relativist's Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics by Eric Poisson is a bit beyond the purely introductory level, but it does provide practical guidance on doing certain calculations which is missing from a lot of other books.
share|improve this answer
    
Also, Sean Carroll's notes on GR: preposterousuniverse.com/grnotes (which later turned into his book) –  nibot Nov 8 '10 at 18:15
1  
I would vote for Schutz. It is mathematically rigorous enough. –  Gordon Feb 2 '11 at 16:45
    
Some of the others look good, but are more "Thorne-y" and frankly, hard (haven't looked at Sean's). Weinberg has updated and written a new book on Cosmology –  Gordon Feb 2 '11 at 16:49
    
I am used to Schutz. It is excellent, but it does no mention to electrodynamics, so it is a good idea to start first with an excerpt from, say, Jackson about SR, and then use Schutz. –  Eduardo Guerras Valera Nov 28 '12 at 16:17
    
I also have Wald, but have worked out only until chapter 6. I would dare to say that the rest of the book is almost forbidden if you are not a mathematician (which I am not). It is not a book for beginners, but when I have a conceptual difficulty, I always end up with Wald in my hands... –  Eduardo Guerras Valera Nov 28 '12 at 16:22
show 8 more comments

I think D'Inverno's "Introducing Einstein's Relativity" is a good text for a rigorous primer in GR.

The following link could be useful for you:

http://www.desy.de/user/projects/Physics/Administrivia/rel_booklist.html

To have fun while reading these books, you can enjoy "The Einstein Theory of Relativity: A trip to the fourth dimension", by Lillian Lieber.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! the link is very helpful!! +1 –  Pratik Deoghare Nov 11 '10 at 12:19
add comment

For the mathematically inclined there is also:

Sachs, Wu, General Relativity for Mathematicians (Springer Graduate Texts in Mathematics)

share|improve this answer
add comment

To get a first idea of what GR is all about, with loads of solved exercises, try General Relativity Without Calculus.

share|improve this answer
11  
The OP asked for "Mathematically rigorous" references; I expect this falls a bit short. –  AdamRedwine Sep 7 '11 at 20:56
4  
"Without Calculus"? Seriously? . –  Dimensio1n0 Jul 28 '13 at 7:55
add comment

It all depends on your background. The recent translation to English of Grøn/Næss Norwegian GR book is a very easy and plesant read:

Einstein's Theory: A Rigorous Introduction for the Mathematically Untrained

Still, it is rigorous (it even says so in the title!). They don't go very far, but do touch upon some solutions (e.g. Schwarzschild) and cosmology.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I've been trying to teach myself GTR for about the last twelve months. I stopped my formal maths/physics education when I was 18, many years ago.

IMveryveryHO you could do worse than starting with the twelve video lectures by Leonard Susskind of Stanford University. They're on YouTube but there's a general link here http://www.cosmolearning.com/courses/modern-physics-general-relativity/ They really are excellent.

I find all of the textbooks hard going! But I liked Lambourne (Relativity, Gravitation and Cosmology) - about the most accessible of the bunch, I found. I bought Lambourne after spending a lot of time trying to understand Schutz, which is quite rigorous enough for me and a good reference book for my level. He takes you through the maths quite carefully, but it's not easy and big chunks go straight over my head. I liked it enough to buy a copy though.

I also like Foster and Nightingale which is nice and concise and which I got cheap second hand.

I bought D'Inverno second hand but I wish I hadn't bothered. Much too difficult, though I do occasionally look at it.

I tried Relativity Demystified but it didn't.

Carroll has put a complete course of notes online as well. See http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/Carroll_contents.html

You might also want to take a look at A Most Incomprehensible Thing: Notes Towards a Very Gentle Introduction to the Mathematics of Relativity by Collier.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I would suggest it really is worth reading Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (MTW). Its the only textbook I have managed to find which really explains things so I can understand each line and also covers the main advanced aspects of the theory. I would also definitely suggest you should have read a good book on special relativity before tackling MTW.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Lillian Lieber: Einstein's Theory of Relativity.

share|improve this answer
add comment

To me there a two sides to understanding GR. For the conceptual side you cannot do any better than getting it straight from the horses mouth (i.e. Einstein):

http://www.bartleby.com/173/

The other side of the coin is the mathematical apparatus. I got a lot of mileage out of this introduction to tensor calculus for GR:

http://web.mit.edu/edbert/GR/gr1.pdf

Really focuses on the bare-bones of the math while not omitting the coordinate free treatment. Only prerequisites are calculus and linear algebra.

Then as an additional reference I find L. D. Landau's text book on theoretical physics Vol 2 very useful.

share|improve this answer
add comment

You can't beat a bit of Hobson.

share|improve this answer
add comment

While I myself like Ludvigsen "General Relativity: A geometric approach", it probably doesn't fall into the category of being "mathematicallly rigorous". If you really want Mathematical rigour, then Wald "General Relativity"

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
    
This has already been mentioned. –  MBN Jul 28 '13 at 18:01
1  
@MBN: Ooops, didn't notice . –  Dimensio1n0 Jul 29 '13 at 1:46
add comment

One key title appears missing from the answers provided so far: Einstein Gravity in a Nutshell by Tony Zee. This new book (published 2013) provides a mathematically rigorous treatment, yet is colloquial in tone and very accessible. I own Wald, Schutz, and Hartle, but Zee's book has quickly developed into my favorite text on General Relativity.

Those who have read Zee's Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell know what to expect. The two 'Nutshell titles' combined give an amazingly accessible and complete introductory overview of modern physics.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I recommend you those books from the excellent Chicago Physics Bibliography:

  • Schutz, B., A First Course in Generaly Relativity

    Schutz's book is a really nice introduction to GR, suitable for undergraduates who've had a bit of linear algebra and are willing to spend some time thinking about the math he develops. It's a good book for audodidacts, because the development of the theory is pedagogical and the problems are designed to get you used to the basic techniques. (Come to think of it, Schutz's book is not a bad place to learn about tensor calculus, which is one of the handiest tools in the physics toolkit.) Concludes with a little section on cosmology.

  • Dirac, P.A.M., General Relativity

    You might have heard that Paul Dirac was a man of few words. Read this book to find out how terse he could be. It develops the essentials of Lorentzian geometry and of general relativity, up through black holes, gravitational radiation, and the Lagrangian formulation, in a blinding 69 pages! I think this book grew out of some undergrad lectures Dirac delivered on GR; they are more designed to show what the hell theory is all about than to teach you how to do calculations. I actually didn't like them all that much; they were a little too dry for my taste. It's amusing though, to put Dirac's book next to the book of Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler.

  • D'Inverno, R., Introducing Einstein's Relativity

    I think that D'Inverno is the best of the undergraduate texts on GR (an admittedly small group). It's a tad less elementary than Schutz, and it has a lot more detail and excursions into interesting topics. I seem to remember that it's development of necessary mathematics struck me as somehow lacking, but unfortunately I don't remember what exactly annoyed me. But for physics, I don't think you can beat it. Just be careful: you might find that there's a bit too much here.

  • Misner, C., Thorne, K., & Wheeler, J.A., Gravitation

    Gravitation has a lot of nicknames: MTW, the Phonebook, the Bible, the Big Black Book, etc,... It's over a thousand pages in length, and probably weighs about 10 pounds. It makes a very effective doorstop, but it would be a shame to use it as one. MTW was written in the late 60's/early 70's by three of the best gravitational physicists around--Kip Thorne, Charles Misner, and John Wheeler--and it's a truly great book. I'm not sure I'd recommend it for first time buyers, but after you know a little about the theory, it's about the most detailed, lucid, poetic, humorous, and comprehensive exposition of gravity that you could ask for. Poetic? Humorous? Yep. MTW is laden with stories and quotations. Detailed? Lucid? Oh yes. The theory of general relativity is all laid out in loving detail. You will not find a better explanation of the physics of gravitation anywhere. Comprehensive? Well, sorta. MTW is a little out of date. MTW is good for the basics, but there's actually been quite a bit of work done in GR since it's publication in 1973. See Wald for details.

  • Wald, R., General Relativity

    My favorite book on relativity. Wald's book is elegant, sophisticated, and highly geometric. That's geometric in the sense of modern differential geometry, not in the sense of lots of pictures, however. (If you want pictures, read MTW.) After a concise introduction to the theory of metric connections & curvature on Lorentzian manifolds, Wald develops the theory very quickly. Fortunately, his exposition is very clear and supplemented by good problems. After he's introduced Einstein's equation, he spends some time on the Schwarzchild and Friedman metrics, and then moves on into a collection of interesting advanced topics such as causal structure and quantum field theory in strong gravitational fields.

  • Stewart, J., Advanced General Relativity

    Stewart's book is often for sale at Powell's, which is why I've included it in this list. It's coverage of differential geometry is very modern, and useful if you want some of the flavor of modern geometry. But it's topics are all covered in Wald's book and more clearly to boot.

share|improve this answer
add comment

http://home.uchicago.edu/~geroch/Links_to_Notes.html

The lecture notes by Geroch. Including notes on general relativity.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.