Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am reading Xiao-Gang Wen's paper "Pattern-of-zeros approach to Fractional quantum Hall states and a classification of symmetric polynomial of infinite variables", on page 8, he gives three interaction potentials for various Laughlin state and claim that these Laughlin state are exactly the zero-energy ground state of the given interaction potential. I do have some questions about these interaction potentials.

  1. I do believe that the second term in the interaction potential for $\nu=1/4$ is from Kivelson-Trugman's delta function expansion ("Exact results for the fractional quantum Hall effect with general interactions"), but I think in their paper, the Laplacian is with respect to the relative coordinate which is $z_{rel}=z_1-z_2$, but why in Xiao-Gang's paper that Laplacian is only with respect to $z_1$?

  2. Why the delta function only involves $z$, but no conjugate $z^*$? Isn't a two dimensional delta function usually defined as $\delta(z,z^*)$?

share|improve this question
    
Here is a free arXiv version of the paper. –  Qmechanic Sep 11 '12 at 7:45
add comment

1 Answer 1

I haven't read your paper but is Laplacian not invariant by translation ? Z=z1-z2 For the notation for δ(z,z∗), you are right to say that to recover x, y you need z and z*, but it might just be a shorthening of the writing.

share|improve this answer
    
The situation I am concerned is that when you treat the delta function as a limiting case of a Gaussian function(say if we want to investigate the interaction range for this Laplacian of the delta function), then if z is the only variable wouldn't make sense. –  huyichen Sep 11 '12 at 6:16
    
There is an extension of the distribution theory to the complex plane through the Cauchy's integral. You have a problem because you try to go back to real variables z=x+i*y en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_delta_function –  Shaktyai Sep 11 '12 at 8:21
    
I am aware of that definition, but I don't think that is quite equivalent to a two dimensional delta function, maybe a delta function for analytic complex functions. –  huyichen Sep 11 '12 at 18:36
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.