Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it true that whenever an action takes place it is dependent on both its past and future? I mean if we already know that whatever we are doing is dependent on future as much as it is dependent on the past. If that is the case how can you not tell what I will be typing next?

share|cite|improve this question
What makes you think I can't tell what you will be typing next? – WillO Sep 8 '12 at 12:50
If you formulate this question properly, by logical positivism, there is no problem. This is not a meaningful contradiction, your brain is only fooling you into thinking it is. – Ron Maimon Sep 8 '12 at 15:49
Comment to the question(v1): If OP by the word action means $S=\int_{t_i}^{t_f}\!dt~L$, then it seems that OP's question is related to this Phys.SE post. – Qmechanic Jan 24 '13 at 14:23
up vote 1 down vote accepted

If you leave aside quantum mechanics, the laws of Physics are deterministic. That means if you have a perfect description of a system you can calculate the properties of the system arbitrarily far into it's past or future. So if you know the properties of the system at some time you can tell what the system was like in the past. However just because we are calculating past properties from future properties I wouldn't say that makes the properties of the system dependant on it's future.

Which is all very well, but many interesting systems are chaotic and since it's impossible to characterise even a classical system perfectly we can't calculate the systems properties for more than a short distance into the future.

And of course in quantum mechanics we have the collapse of the wavefunction, which means we can't calculate the results of future observations. The best we can do is assign them a probability.

share|cite|improve this answer

You just have to applied logic to your question to get an answer:

If(an action that takes place is dependent on both its past and future) then ( you can tell what I will be typing next).

Since you do not know (what I will be typing next) you conclude that (an action that takes place now is independent of its future).

In math logic, that translates into: A=>B <=> no(B)=>no(A)

share|cite|improve this answer

Coexistence of Past and Future Measurements’ Effects...

Can a Future Choice Affect a Past Measurement's Outcome?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.