Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was taught in school that acceleration due to gravity is constant. But recently, when I checked Physics textbook, I noted that

$$F = \dfrac{G \cdot m_1 \cdot m_2}{r^2} $$

So, as the body falls down, $r$ must be changing, so should acceleration due to gravity.

share|cite|improve this question
This inverse-square law is actually meant for "Gravitational attraction between two bodies" $F=mg$ is the actual one... $r$ doesn't come there... – Waffle's Crazy Peanut Sep 7 '12 at 18:05
Ok, but didn't $F = mg$ originate from the inverse-square law ? – user13107 Sep 7 '12 at 18:07
@CrazyBuddy that sort of information would be better provided in an answer. – David Z Sep 7 '12 at 18:20
@CrazyBuddy: In $F=mg$, $g$ varies with height. – Ben Crowell Sep 8 '12 at 0:10
up vote 9 down vote accepted

This is a first introduction to the issue of the relative changes in physics.

Consider the motion of objects near the Earth's surface. Call the nominal radius of the Earth $R \approx 6400\text{ km}$, and the height of the object $h$.

Now the acceleration due to gravity at $h$ is $$ g = \frac{F_g}{m} = G\frac{M_e m}{(R + h)^2 m} = G\frac{M_e}{(R + h)^2} $$and lets manipulate this a little $$ g = G\frac{M_e}{(R + h)^2} = G\frac{M_e}{R^2(1 + h/R)^2} \approx G\frac{M_e}{R^2}\left(1 -2\frac{h}{R} \right).$$ The last approximation there is dropping higher order terms in $\frac{h}{R}$ which will shortly be seen to be justified.

So, ask yourself how big is $\frac{h}{R}$ for the situations you encounter in your life. A few meters or a few tens of meters at most, right? So $\frac{h}{R}$ is of order $10^{-5}$ or smaller over human scales or $10^{-3}$ even over the whole height range that we use including airplane elevations.

So, for almost all calculation that you want to make the variation of $g$ negligible.

Physicists get a lot of millage out of these kinds of considerations to the point that you there is a fair amount of shorthand devoted to discussing fractional changes. People say things like "Yeah, but it's down by two orders of magnitude, so we can neglect it".

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks. Shouldn't this be included in textbooks ? – user13107 Sep 7 '12 at 18:16
No. Your instructor should have pointed you in the right direction if you showed an interest and not disturbed those who didn't ask with the extra math. – dmckee Sep 7 '12 at 18:21
@user13107 It is, but perhaps not the ones you've been reading. – David Z Sep 7 '12 at 18:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.