Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What's a physical meaning of, for example, complex part of the solution for coordinate change of the anharmonic oscillator? Why after substitute (for diff. equation solve) for real x we can earn $x = Re(z) + iIm(z)$? It's because of substitute?

share|improve this question
Can you give some more context for your question? What does "coordinate change of the anharmonic oscillator" mean? –  Ryan Thorngren Sep 7 '12 at 3:43
For example, solve for equation $a \ddot x + b \dot x + c x = f(t)$. –  PhysiXxx Sep 7 '12 at 3:49
Okay, got it. I'll write something up in the answers. –  Ryan Thorngren Sep 7 '12 at 3:50
@Maxim_Ovchinnikov: This is not called "anharmonic", it's called "damped". Anharmonic is nonlinear, and the complex business doesn't work for this. –  Ron Maimon Sep 7 '12 at 15:28
Oh, really. Thank you. –  PhysiXxx Sep 8 '12 at 14:15

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

When we wish to solve a differential equation like your example, a good guess for when $f(t)=0$ is something of the form $x(t) = e^{i \alpha t}$. This just gives us an algebraic equation for $\alpha$, which we can just solve. I interpret your question to mean: but what is this solution? Why is it complex? Indeed, position should certainly be just a real number. The resolution is that a general solution to the differential equation will not be of the form $x(t)=e^{i\alpha t}$ for $\alpha$ solving our algebraic equation. In general there will be a couple solutions to the algebraic equation for $\alpha$--just two in your example--say $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$. Then a general solution to your diffeq with $f(t)=0$ is of the form $x(t) = A e^{i \alpha_1 t} + B e^{i \alpha_2 t}$ for some complex constants $A$ and $B$. We then need boundary conditions to choose $A$ and $B$ properly. The crux of the biscuit is we can choose $A$ and $B$ so that an $x(t)$ of this form is real for all times $t$ (this assumes $a$, $b$, and $c$ are real in the original equation).

So using the complex guess $x(t) = e^{i\alpha t}$ is just a computational trick which makes things easy because the complex numbers have nice properties with algebraic equations (they are algebraically closed). We could have done the whole thing without $e$, instead just using sines and cosines and it would have worked out too.

share|improve this answer
But why sometimes we discard a complex part of the solution? –  PhysiXxx Sep 7 '12 at 4:10
In what situation? –  Ryan Thorngren Sep 7 '12 at 4:12
Oh, I understand. When we use substitute $x = Ae^{i\varphi t}$, we add a complex part to the real part of $x$. So after finding the solution we need to discard a complex part. But when we use substitution $x = Ae^{\varphi t}$, we need to apply a condition of $x = x*$ to the solution. –  PhysiXxx Sep 7 '12 at 15:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.