Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

These days I was studying the quantum theory.I found that some theories about that is similar to Fourier Transform theory.For instance, it says "A finite-time light's frequency can't be a certain value", which is similar to "A finite signal has infinite frequency spectrum" in Fourier analysis theory.I think that a continuous frequency spectrum can not be measured accurately, which is similar to Uncertainty principle by Hermann Weyl. How do you think about this?

share|improve this question
1  
Hi user1297181, and welcome to Physics Stack Exchange! Your question is essentially "How do you think about this?" and that suggests that you might be looking for a discussion, not an answer, which suggests that this may not be appropriate for this site in its current form (see the FAQ). If you can be more specific about what you're asking, it will probably be fine. –  David Z Sep 6 '12 at 1:36
    
This is generally true--- Fourier analysis is a fundamental part of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, but it is taken for granted, you are supposed to have internalized it. –  Ron Maimon Sep 6 '12 at 1:44
    
Thanks @DavidZaslavsky for your good suggestion. I think I should have studied the FAQ first. But I still wonder the key to this question, not just meaning "How do you think this". –  lai Sep 6 '12 at 2:07
    
Dear @RonMaimon, where can I get more information about it? –  lai Sep 6 '12 at 2:24
1  
Functions $exp(ikx)$ are eigenfunctions of momentum operator $-i\partial/\partial x$; that is the main (and perhaps only) link between QM and Fourier analysis. –  user10001 Sep 7 '12 at 1:14
add comment

1 Answer

Yes, there is a very strong interconnection.

A particle in q.m. hasn't got a defined position. Instead, there is a function describing the probability amplitude distribution for the position: the wavefunction $u(x)$. This is always told even in books for the general public. However, also the momentum of the particle isn't, in general, well defined: for it also we have a probability amplitude distribution, let's call it $w(p)$. It happens that $u$ and $w$ are in some sense the fourier transforms one of the other. The reason is the following. In Dirac's notation, $$u(x) = \langle x|\psi\rangle,\quad w(p)=\langle p|\psi\rangle $$ where $|\psi\rangle$ is the state of the particle, $|x\rangle,|p\rangle$ are respectively the eigenstates of the position and momentum operators.

Suppose to work in the $x$ basis. The $p$ operator is written $-i\hbar\partial/\partial x$. To find eigenstates of $p$, we can call $\langle x|p\rangle=f_p(x)$ $$ -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f_p(x)=pf_p(x)$$ which yields to $f_p(x) = e^{ipx/\hbar}$.

Now, to pass from a basis to the other we can write $$\langle p|\psi\rangle= \int \langle p|x\rangle\langle x|\psi\rangle dx$$ or $$ w(p) = \int e^{-ipx/\hbar}u(x)dx$$ which is a Fourier transform! The $\hbar$ factor is to give the correct dimensionality.

Nice, isn't it? As you pointed out, the fact that if $u$ is "spread" then $w$ is "peaked" and vice versa is typical of Fourier transformed functions. So Heisenberg's principle can be thought to come from here.

This holds for a lot of conjugated quantum variables.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.