Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm reading Zwiebach's First Course in String Theory. At present I'm learning about string coupling. Zwiebach says it's possible to prove that $g_o^2=g_c$ where $g_o,\ g_c$ are open and closed string coupling constants respectively. He claims this is due to certain topological properties of world sheets.

Why, more precisely, is this true? Could someone explain and/or point me towards a proof?

Many thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The relationship holds because the Feynman diagrams in string theory are weighted by a function of the Euler characteristic $\chi$ (pronounce: chi) $${\mathcal A}_\Sigma = g_c^{-\chi_\Sigma} \cdot {\mathcal A}_\text{without couplings} $$ Now, a history of splitting and joining strings may be represented by a Riemann surface (after switching to the Euclidean world sheet signature and after some conformal transformations are being done) and the general Riemann surface may be written as a genus $h$ surface (i.e. a sphere with $h$ extra handles added, for example $h=1$ gives the torus) with $b$ extra boundaries (a disk that is cut from the surface somewhere) and $c$ extra crosscaps (boundaries with the identification of the opposite points so that the surface has no new boundaries but becomes unorientable). It may be shown that $$\chi = 2-2h - b - c,$$ see for example the article under the "Euler characteristic" link above. So the addition of a handle, $h\to h+1$, which is equivalent to adding two closed-string interaction vertices (a tube i.e. a virtual closed string gets emitted by the surface and it gets absorbed elsewhere), changes the Euler characteristic to $\chi\to \chi-2$ and adds $g_c^2$ to the dependence of the diagram on the string couplings.

That's the same change we may also obtain by adding two boundaries, $b\to b+2$. But one extra boundary adds an open-string loop i.e. two open-interaction vertices (a line interval i.e. a virtual open string gets emitted somewhere at the boundary of the world sheet and it gets reabsorbed, creating a new boundary inside), so two boundaries are four open-string interaction vertices and the diagram therefore gets an extra $g_o^4$. We therefore have $g_c^2\sim g_o^4$ or $g_c\sim g_o^2$ (up to the overall purely numerical coefficient that has to be calculated correctly, and up to a sign).

For some basics about the topology of stringy diagrams and their dependence on the string coupling, see e.g. the beginning of Chapter 3 of Joe Polchinski's String Theory, volume I. Your proportionality appears as equation (3.2.7) over there.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much! – Edward Hughes Sep 3 '12 at 9:13
Nice illustrative explanation, I like this too :-)! – Dilaton Sep 3 '12 at 9:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.