Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Stated: The atomic spectra of hydrogen and deuterium are similar however shifted in energies.

So im trying to explain why it is that the emission lines are shifted and how they are shifted.

Since the nucleus of deuterium contains both a proton and a neutron its notably heavier than the nuclueus of hydrogen, which only contains a proton. And since the transition energy is given by following equation: $E_i-E_f = \frac{\mu_xZ^2e^4}{(4\pi\varepsilon_0)^22h^2}\left[\frac {1}{n_f^2}-\frac {1}{n_i^2}\right]$, where $\mu_x $ is the reduced mass of Atom $X$. its clear that the energy varies with the atom mass.

But i dont really know how to tackle the second part of my problem i.e. explaining how they are shifted.

Thank you in advance!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Consider the ratio of their shifts in energy. Since all the numbers are the same except for the reduced mass you are looking at something like: $$ \frac{(E_i -E_f)_p}{(E_i -E_f)_d}=\frac{\mu_p}{\mu_d}=\frac{m_p m_e(m_d +m_e)}{(m_p +m_e)m_d m_e} $$ If we cancel the $m_e$ and then pull a $m_d$ out of the top and a $m_p$ out of the bottom we get $$ \frac{(E_i -E_f)_p}{(E_i -E_f)_d}=\frac{(1+\frac{m_e}{m_d})}{(1+\frac{m_e}{m_p})} $$ I hope this helps.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! alot that really helped – meLCoding Aug 29 '12 at 19:20

They have different reduced masses. Because the mass the proton is about 1800 times that of the electron, it's typical to approximate the reduced mass of the hydrogen atom as the mass of the electron. If you use the exact formula for the reduced mass instead of that approximation, you should get that the reduced mass of hydrogen is $\mu_H = 0.99946m_e$, and that the reduced mass of deuterium is $\mu_D = 0.99973m_e$. The ratio of the transitions is then the ratio of those reduced masses, as @knjves explains. That is a very small difference, but it is measurable.

share|cite|improve this answer
Please correct me if i understood this wrong. Now that we have the ratio of the reduced masses, does it suffice to just multiply this ratio with the, otherwise well-known, transition energys of regular hydrogen? (e.g. take the ballmer series of hydrogen). I thought it would be nice to depict the shift in a energy-level diagram.. – meLCoding Aug 29 '12 at 19:24
I believe that is the case. @knives's answer makes that more explicit. – Colin McFaul Sep 1 '12 at 2:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.