Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question is directed to Prof. 't Hooft and anybody who is familiar with his papers. It is a reaction to Prof. 't Hooft's question why nobody is excited about his classical models for quantum mechnanics. My reasoning behind the question is simple. Humans have no good intution for quantum mechanics. But they normally have a very good intution for any kind of classical model. Now one of the simplest and in fact the canonical example for quantum weirdness is the double slit experiment. Combining these two things I think it is a very natural question to ask.

share|cite|improve this question
Seems you may be interested in a debate. I suggest editing your post to follow the "FAQ": – Argus Aug 23 '12 at 0:01
Particularly "Your questions should be reasonably scoped. If you can imagine an entire book that answers your question, you’re asking too much." – Argus Aug 23 '12 at 0:02
Hi Mikael, and welcome to Physics Stack Exchange! As Argus said, we prefer to have focused questions on this site. I think the reason your post is receiving a negative reaction is that it's hard to tell what you're really asking. If you could clarify the question, for example by identifying what simple model you want to know about, it might be better received. Feel free to ask for help improving your post using the "add comment" link just below this. – David Z Aug 23 '12 at 0:22
Thanks for your feedback. I will follow your advice and rename the question. It is really about the 't Hooft models I want to ask. – Mikael Aug 23 '12 at 17:30
Mikael, your question is a recipe for extra trouble but it is also a very good question (the question is in the title) and the silence when it comes to the answers is telling. Of course that the answer is No, there ain't such a model, but what's even more important is that it has become fashionable to ignore such problems, ignore the double slit experiment, ignore any genuine physics question in favor of preserving scientifically indefensible ideology. The goal of such systems of papers isn't to explain the double slit experiment or any real effect; it's to defend wrong philosophical cliches – Luboš Motl Aug 24 '12 at 12:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.