Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

why when we want to evaluate a functional determinant we use the expansion near $ t=0$ for the partition function $ \sum_{n}e^{-tE_{n}} \sim \sum_{n} a_{n} (t)t^{n} $ instead of just using the semiclassical partition function ?? $ \iint _{\Gamma}dx dpe^{-tp^{2}-tV(x)} $ which is just easier to handle with ? fo rexamplelin almost all papers i have seen this asymptotic approximation for the partition function near $ t=0$ although coefficients are hard to evaluate.

share|cite|improve this question
The usual expansions are not exactly in t, but they do Taylor expand the exponential. The semiclassical expansion is also used, for example, to calculate instanton decays. The question isn't stated so clearly--- are you asking why Taylor expand rather than do semiclassical? – Ron Maimon Aug 23 '12 at 6:03
i was asking why do not use semiclassical expansion instead of the taylor power series near $ t=0 $ that was all – Jose Javier Garcia Aug 23 '12 at 9:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.