Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Morrison writes in "Morrison, Michael A. : Understanding quantum physics : a user's manual"

$ |\Psi(x,t)|^2 \xrightarrow[x\rightarrow\pm \infty ]{} 0$ at all times t [bound state]

$ |\Psi(x,t)|^2 \xrightarrow[x\rightarrow\pm \infty ]{} 0$ at any particular time t [unbound state]

So I can imagine that "all" means the entirety of all times, but do I not get "all" when summing over all particular states?

I also understand that in a bound state, the wave is never at the infinity position, but the wave of an unbound state may exist there.

share|cite|improve this question

I don't have access to the book M.A. Morrison, Understanding quantum physics: a user's manual, but it seems that the phrase

at all times $t$

is used in the sense that the $x$-limit is

uniform in $t\in\mathbb{R}$,

while the phrase

at any particular time $t$

is used in the sense that the $x$-limit is

pointwise in $t\in\mathbb{R}$.

In other words, the difference is in the ordering of pertinent quantifiers. Note that Morrison's above terminology is not standard.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is surely right, but one could clarify by saying that a nonuniform limit happens when a bump is travelling to infinity without spreading out. This doesn't happen in the Schrodinger equation, so he could have been less careful. – Ron Maimon Aug 22 '12 at 6:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.