Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I keep reading in the Physics World focus issue on vacuum technology about scientists creating high temperatures in the vacuums etc.

If heat is caused by thermal energy being radiated from particles due to their energy, then how can there be heat in a vacuum, as there are no particles present?

share|improve this question
1  
it would be nice if you provided the link to the article/its abtract –  Yrogirg Aug 14 '12 at 18:17
    
Why would that be necessary? –  Olly Price Aug 15 '12 at 14:04
    
so we could see what do they mean by "high temperatures in the vacuums" –  Yrogirg Aug 15 '12 at 14:08
    
Obviously they just said a high temperature... e.g. "setting the vacuum to temperatures of 900K" or something. Clearly. –  Olly Price Aug 15 '12 at 14:10
    
"Obviously they just said a high temperature... e.g. "setting the vacuum to temperatures of 900K" or something." I bet that's exactly what they said in their published work. "We set vacuum to temperature 900K", and nothing more, that's certainly how does science works. –  Yrogirg Aug 15 '12 at 17:30
show 1 more comment

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Heat is not

caused by thermal energy being radiated from particles due to their energy

heat is the ramdomized (i.e. neglecting bulk flows) energy of motion in any material (including, for instance, photon gases).

Any vacuum that we can make or have access too includes a small amount of matter, and the temperature of that stuff can be measured. Not that because there is very little stuff even high temperatures do not imply a lot of heat.

share|improve this answer
    
Think you've confused heat with internal energy –  Benjamin Hodgson Aug 14 '12 at 22:33
add comment

Vacuum is often defined as "space entirely devoid of matter". On the other hand, in physics, we often discern matter and radiation. So there can be radiation in vacuum, and it can have a certain temperature. Of course, this depends on the definitions, and I don't think this is what was meant in the article.

By the way, you do need to give a reference - this is standard practice in science, and it makes a lot of sense - with all due respect, we can never be sure your citation is accurate, unless we have a reference. We generally do not believe each other without proof in science :-)

share|improve this answer
add comment

In the case of vacuum that you are referring to the scientists are loosely referring to the kinetic energy of the particles as their temperature: $(1/2) m v^2 = (3/2) kT$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.