Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

enter image description here

(a) I am a little confused about this part. The point at A to B isn't radial. The electric field is radially outward, but if I look at the integral

$$\int_{a}^{b}\mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{s} = \int_{a}^{b}\frac{\rho r}{3\epsilon_0}\mathbf{\hat{r}}\cdot d\mathbf{s}$$

The vector ds and r can't be in the same direction, so do I have to express it in norm form of the dot product? I am afraid to do so. So my wishful thinking answer (since it says it is 2 marks ) is

$$\int_{a}^{b}\mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{s} = \int_{r}^{R} \frac{\rho r}{3\epsilon_0}dr$$

(b) Okay this one isn't too bad, but i am extremely paranoid. So I went back to the definition of potential

$$V = k\int\frac{dq}{d}$$ Since the density is uniform, I simply get $V = \dfrac{kQ}{d}$

Now I just substitute $r$ into equation and get $V = \dfrac{kQ}{r} = \dfrac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0r}$.

Note that "d" is the radial distance. I avoided using r or R becuase the picture uses r and R

Thank you for reading

share|improve this question
    
You find the potential as a function of r, and then subtract the potential at the two points, don't do the integral. You did the second problem wrong. –  Ron Maimon Aug 9 '12 at 9:01
    
subtract for part a, for part b, you integrate E from 0 to A along a radial line. The field is ${\rho\over 3}r$, so you get ${\rho\over 6}r^2 + C$ where C is a constant, which is fixed from matching the potential to the potential from the sphere at r=R. –  Ron Maimon Aug 9 '12 at 18:34
    
Misleading is a little harsh--- the problem is testing to see if you understand potential. The answer would be that if both points are outside the sphere. The potential inside isn't $Q/R$ anymore, but you find what it is at any value of r, and then subtract at the two points. –  Ron Maimon Aug 9 '12 at 18:42
    
Also, i just noticed the edit in tags. This isn't really homework, I just picked the problem from an online source. –  jip Aug 9 '12 at 20:20
1  
Your terms and constants are wrong, try it again. The answer you should get is $V(d)={ kQ\over d}$ for $d>R$, and $V(d) = {3kQ \over 2R^3} - {kQ\over 2R^3} d^2$ for $d<R$. You can check that the two forms match at d=R, and that the derivative of V is the electric field you know from Gauss's law. You can't get rid of the $4\pi$ factors from all the terms if you use both $Q$ and $\rho$, since the $4\pi$ is coming from the volume of the sphere $Q={4\pi R^3\over 3 } \rho$. –  Ron Maimon Aug 10 '12 at 1:03

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Why are you looking for a radial surface..? Look it as an Equipotential surface (a surface where all points are at same constant electric potential) as it comes with sphere. Hence, you can assume the points A to B as radial to find the potential difference.

share|improve this answer

Use Gauss theorem to get the electric field at a distance r of the center. By symmetry, the electric field is radial and constant on any sphere of radius r, so it is easy to calculate its flux. Then compute the circulation of E between A and B to get Vb-Va

share|improve this answer
    
Why do I need to calculate the Electric field again? It's given to me. I don't see why the flux plays a role here. –  jip Aug 9 '12 at 18:16
    
You are right. I did not properly read the first lines. You only need to calculate the circulation of E from A to B. Advice: choose the path AA'+A'B where A' lies on OA and the same circle than B. –  Shaktyai Aug 9 '12 at 20:48

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.