Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to calculate the conductivity in the linear response regime of a disordered electron gas. (or eventually of a mean field Heavy fermion system with known one particle green's functions).

I trying to use method in "Quantum field theory of non-equilibium states" by J.Rammer. Specifically I'm looking at section 6.2. Honestly, I don't understand very much of what he is doing. Have somebody done those calculations and could give guidelines on how to think and perhaps some more steps in the derivations?

My question in short would be: If I know the known free Green's functions, how do I calculate linear response when applying an electrical field?

share|improve this question
    
Rammer's book isn't quite what you need. In the linear response regime you relate the response to some applied field to equilibrium properties of the system absent the field. While the full theory of the non-equilibrium Green's functions will also let you calculate what you need, what you ought to be looking for is something called the "Kubo formula". –  wsc Aug 2 '12 at 4:25
    
I have seen the Kubo formula. But it would be nice if one could derive the Kubo formula from the linear regime of the Dyson equations. The current can, as far as i know, be expressed in terms of the kinetic (Keldysh) Green's function. I don't understand how though. –  Garvan Aug 2 '12 at 8:24
    
A solid reference and a very clean derivation of Kubo in just this context is provided by Eduardo Fradkin in his Field Theory of Condensed Matter Physics, CUP. The second edition just came out. Much of this material is freely available on his web site at UIUC, but the book is very comprehensive. –  user27777 Aug 2 '13 at 7:34

1 Answer 1

I can try to sketch out the general idea here, but my deduction may not be very precise (please refer to your books to check out the coefficients and sign conventions).

So I guess the question is that given a free Fermion system described by the following action $$S=-\sum_k\psi_k^\dagger G^{-1}(k)\psi_k, ...(1)$$ where $G(k)=-\langle\psi_k\psi_k^\dagger\rangle$ is the Green's function at the momentum-frequency $k=(i\omega,\vec{k})$, what is the DC electric conductivity?

  1. Start from the definition of the conductivity $j_\mu=\sigma_{\mu\nu} E_{\nu}$ (where $j_\mu$ is the current and $E_\nu$ is the electric field). Consider the linear (differential) response $$\sigma_{\mu\nu}= \frac{\delta j_\mu}{\delta E_\nu}....(2)$$
  2. Introduce the gauge potential $A_\mu$. By definition, current is the source of the gauge potential, i.e. $j_\mu = \delta S/\delta A_\mu$, and the electric field is the conjugate momentum of the gauge potential, which means $E_\nu=\partial_t A_\nu$ according to the equation of motion. Plug into the expression Eq. (2) for $\sigma$ $$\sigma_{\mu\nu} = \frac{\delta}{\delta \partial_t A_\nu}\frac{\delta S}{\delta A_\mu}=-i\delta_{A_0}\delta_{A_\nu}\delta_{A_\mu}S....(3)$$ Because $i\partial_t$ means the frequency $i\omega$. For DC conductivity, we should send the frequency $i\omega\to 0$, which means we are actually varying with respect to $i\omega$. But because $i\omega$ always appears with the chemical potential $A_0$ in the form of $(i\omega+A_0)$ in the action, so it will be equivalent to just varying with respect to $A_0$. This is how we can replace $1/\partial_t$ by $-i\delta_{A_0}$ (there are more rigors deduction for this replacement but let us take this simple argument for now).
  3. You may be wondering how the gauge potential $A_\mu$ entered the action $S$ (note that the original Fermion action does not even containing the field $A_\mu$). This is done by the minimal coupling procedure, which simply replace every $k$ by $k+A$. So the action in Eq. (1) is actually $S=-\sum_k\psi_k^\dagger G^{-1}(k+A)\psi_k$. The idea is then integrate out the Fermion field $\psi$, and obtain the effective action for the gauge field $S[A]$, then can calculate the conductivity by Eq. (3). But all these can be done in a simpler way by noticing that $k$ always appears with $A$, so $\delta_A=\delta_k$, and hence Eq. (3) becomes $$\sigma_{\mu\nu}=-i\delta_{k_0}\delta_{k_\nu}\delta_{k_\mu}S....(4)$$
  4. To calculate the momentum-frequency variation, we should first integrate out the Fermion field $\psi$: $$S\xrightarrow{\int\mathcal{D}[\psi]}S=-\sum_k\text{Tr}\ln(-G^{-1}(k))....(5)$$ Using the differentiation rule $\delta G = G (\delta G^{-1}) G$ which follows from the definition $G G^{-1}\equiv 1$ (and by varying both sides), it is not hard to show from Eqs. (4) and (5) that $$\sigma_{\mu\nu}=-i\sum_k \text{Tr} G(k)\gamma_0 G(k)\gamma_\nu G(k)\gamma_\mu, ...(6)$$ where the $\gamma$ matrices are defined as $$\gamma_\mu=-\partial_{k_\mu}G^{-1}(k)....(7)$$

Ok. Eq. (6) is already the Kubo formula written in terms of the Green's function. You may just plug in your Green's function and complete the momentum-frequency summation to get the electric conductivity.

EXAMPLE:

To demonstrate how this works, please allow me to present a simple example. Consider the Hall conductance of a two band system $$G(k)=(i\omega\sigma_0-k_1\sigma_1-k_2\sigma_2-m\sigma_3)^{-1}=\frac{i\omega\sigma_0+k_1\sigma_1+k_2\sigma_2+m\sigma_3}{(i\omega)^2-E^2},$$ with $E=\sqrt{k_1^2+k_2^2+m^2}$. From Eq.(7), $\gamma_0=-\sigma_0$, $\gamma_1=\sigma_1$, $\gamma_2=\sigma_2$. Then plugging into Eq. (6). $$\sigma_{\mu\nu}=\sum_{k}\frac{2m}{((i\omega)^2-E^2)^2}=\sum_{\vec{k}}\frac{m}{2E^3}=\frac{m}{2|m|},$$ which is what we expect for a single Dirac cone.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.