# Charge-less, Mass-less, Spin Fields

after looking through a couple QFT texts it seems that all the spin-1/2 fields come associated with a charge of some sort. I was wondering if it's possible to write down a classical lagrangian (with Lorentz invariance) such that after quantization, the excitations of the field are merely spin-1/2 particles with no associated charges (electric, color) of any kind? That is,operators like $a^{\dagger}$ would only make single particle states with helicity $\pm \frac{1}{2}$ and no associated $U(n)$ or $SU(n)$ charges. Thanks.

-
Well, yes, neutrinos are examples, aren't they? – Luboš Motl Jul 28 '12 at 19:20
Don't neutrinos carry weak charge? – John Rennie Jul 28 '12 at 19:24
@LubošMotl I thought they were a prime example too. Could you then clarify something for me then please? Given the Lagrangian $i\psi^{\dagger}\bar{\sigma}^\mu \partial_\mu \psi$, this has a conserved U(1) charge $\psi^{\dagger}\psi$. Then do the creation operators associated with this field theory create spin-1/2 particles with charge $\pm 1$? Forgive my naivete. – kηives Jul 28 '12 at 19:29
@knives: This charge is broken when you give neutrinos mass. – Ron Maimon Jul 28 '12 at 21:09

$$S = \int \bar{\psi}^i \sigma^\mu_{ij} \partial_\mu \psi^j + {M\over 2}(\epsilon_{ij}\psi^i\psi^j + \epsilon_{ij}\bar{\psi}^i\bar{\psi}^j) d^4x$$
Where the $\sigma$ is the Pauli matrix 4-vector. This is a 2 component spinor field with no charge. The mass term breaks the phase invariance of the massless field. This often appears in books by combining the $\psi$ and $\bar{\psi}$ into a 4-spinor, but then the conjugate spinor is not independent. The two-component form doesn't appear very often, but it is the most insightful 4d form in my opinion.
The reason we don't see fundamental fields of this form is because such uncharged fermions have a mass which is tunable, and so generically is at the Planck mass. This isn't as bad as scalar masses, because the $M=0$ point has an extra U(1) global symmetry, although global symmetries are never fundamental.