Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Reading Dirac's Principles of Quantum Mechanics, I encounter in § 36 (Properties of angular momentum) this fragment:

enter image description here

This is for a dynamical system with two angular momenta $\mathbf{m}_1$ and $\mathbf{m}_2$ that commute with one another, and $\mathbf{M}=\mathbf{m}_1+\mathbf{m}_2$. $k_1$ and $k_2$ are the magnitudes of $\mathbf{m}_1$ and $\mathbf{m}_2$, so the possible eigenvalues of $m_{1z}$ are $k_1$, $k_1-\hslash$, $k_1-2\hslash$, ..., $-k_1$, and similarly for $m_{2z}$ and $k_2$.

The question is about the two $2k_2+1$ terms shown in the second line of eq (46). Shouldn't the last one be $2k_2+2$?

share|cite|improve this question
Dirac's expression is correct, just count them explicitly for k=1, k=2 etc, to check the small values, the increment is clearly 2k. – Ron Maimon Jul 28 '12 at 21:25
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I think $2k_2 + 1$ is correct. If you write down the pairs of $k_{1z}$ and $k_{2z}$ they are:

  • ($k_1 - 1$, $-k_2$)
  • ($k_1 - 2$, $-k_2 + 1$)
  • etc
  • ($k_1 - 2k_2$, $k_2 - 1$)
  • ($k_1 - (2k_2+1)$, $k_2$)

So that's $2k_2+1$ of them.

share|cite|improve this answer
I guess you are right. What fooled be is that in other cases, when $-\hslash$ is added the number times changes by 1, and I assumed that would always be the case. Of course, when $k_1 \gg k_1$ there will be quite a few eigenvalues in the middle of the sequence with $k_2+1$ multiplicity... – Jellby Jul 29 '12 at 7:36
                     m_2 ^     ^  M=m_1+m_2
                         |    /
                     \   |   /
 k_2 -----------------------------------------  
     |                 \ | /                 |
     |                  \|/                  |
-----------------------------------------------------> m_1
     |                  /|\                  |
     |                 / | \                 |
-k_2 ----------------------------------------- 
    -k_1             /   |   \               k_1 
                    /    |    v   M=m_1-m_2   

I) Let $k_1$ and $k_2$ be non-negative half-integers or integers. The book is basically counting an integral lattice

$$ (\mathbb{Z}+k_1) \times (\mathbb{Z}+k_2) $$

of $(2k_1+1) \times (2k_2+1)$ points sitting inside a $2k_1 \times 2k_2$ rectangle by using "light-cone" coordinates

$$M ~=~ m_1+m_2, $$ $$\Delta ~=~ m_1-m_2, $$

which are tilded $45^{\circ}$. (Sorry, the ASCII diagram doesn't reproduce the angle $45^{\circ}$ well. Assume $\hbar=1$.)

A multiplicity formula for the lattice points inside the rectangle is

$$\tag{1} {\rm mult}(M) ~=~ 1 + k_1 + k_2 - \max(|M|,|k_1 - k_2|) $$

as a function of the variable

$$M\in(\mathbb{Z}+k_1+k_2) \cap [ -k_1-k_2,k_1+k_2]. $$

The function (1) has a trapezoidal graph:

                      ^ mult(M)
            /---------|---------\   1 + k_1 + k_2 - |k_1 - k_2|
           /|         |         |\
          / |         |         | \
         /  |         |         |  \
      --|---|---------|---------|---|--------> M
 -k_1-k_2   |         |         |  k_1+k_2  
            |         |         |  
       -|k_1-k_2 |          |k_1-k_2 |

II) Group-theoretically, it is important to know the Clebsch-Gordan fusion rule

$$\tag{2} \underline{2k_1+1} \otimes \underline{2k_2+1} ~=~ \oplus_{K=|k_1-k_2|}^{k_1+k_2} \underline{2K+1}$$

in terms of irreps. Here $\underline{1}$, $\underline{2}$, $\underline{3}$, $\ldots$, refer to the singlet irrep, doublet irrep, triplet irrep, $\ldots$, respectively. It is a nice exercise to check that the dimensions on the right- and lef- hand sides of (2) match. See also this question.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.