Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Approaching the following problem:

A plane monochromatic electromagnetic wave with wavelength $\lambda = 2.0 cm$, propagates through a vacuum. Its magnetic field is described by $ > \vec{B} = ( B_x \hat{i} + B_y \hat{j} ) \cos(kz + ωt) $, where $B_x = 1.9 \times 10^{-6} T, B_y = 4.7 \times 10^{-6} T$, and $\hat i$ and $\hat j$ are the unit vectors in the $+x$ and $+y$ directions, respectively. What is $S_z$, the $z$-component of the Poynting vector at $(x = 0, y = 0, z = 0)$ at $t = 0$?

Question 1

What is the Poynting vector in a general sense? i.e. Abstractly, what am I trying to compute?

I know it is described as the directional energy flux density of an electromagnetic field. But, it is not traveling through a symmetric surface or anything of this nature so what am I trying to compute here?

Question 2

How do I actually compute the value I am looking for?

I know $\vec S \equiv \frac{\vec E \times \vec B}{ \mu_0}$ where $\vec E$ is the electric field, $\vec B$ is the magnetic field, and $\mu_0 = 4 \pi \times 10^{-7}$. But, I was under the impression that the magnetic field and the electric field are always perpendicular, why isn't $S_z = \frac{ c}{ \mu_0}$ since we are in a vacuum and $E = cB$?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The Poynting vector $\mathbf{S}$ represents the flow of energy in an EM field. Specifically, if $u$ is the energy density of the field, the Poynting vector satisfies the continuity equation for it: $$\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}+\nabla\cdot\mathbf{S}=0$$ in vacuum. (This is Poynting's theorem.)

In your particular problem, $E$ and $B$ are perpendicular and their cross product is proportional to the product of their amplitudes. Thus $$S_z={c\over\mu_0}B^2.$$ You then have to use your knowledge of $B$ to work out $S$.

share|improve this answer
How do I approach computing $E$, at $x = 0, y = 0, z = 0, t = 0$, wouldn't $B = B_x + B_y$, hence $E = c(B_x + B_y)$? (using this value doesn't give me the correct result) –  rudolph9 Jul 28 '12 at 4:34
Yes, $E$ you work out from $E=cB$. Thus $S_z={c\over\mu_0}(B_x^2+B_y^2)$. –  Emilio Pisanty Jul 28 '12 at 9:44
It ended up being $S_z = -\frac{ c}{ \mu_0}(B_x^2 + B_y^2)$, a negative, and I do not understand why? How does the cross product work out... What I am I interpreting incorrect in the following: $\vec E = [c B_x, cB_y, 0], \vec B = [B_x, B_y, 0]$ and $\vec E \times \vec B = i(c B_y \cdot 0 - 0 \cdot B_y) - j(c B_x \cdot 0 - 0 \cdot B_x) + k(c B_x \cdot B_y - B_x \cdot B_y) = 0$ ? –  rudolph9 Jul 28 '12 at 14:09
$E$ and $B$ are proportional in magnitude but orthogonal to each other as well as to the wave vector, and such that $E$, $B$ and $k$ are a right-handed system. Since $E$, $B$ and $E\times B $ are also right-handed, $S$ goes in the direction of $\vec{k}$ which in this case is negative $z$. –  Emilio Pisanty Jul 28 '12 at 16:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.