Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the history behind the factors of 3 in the classification of electromagnetic radiation?

See e.g.

Is this (just) inherited from the meter unit via the wavelenght frequency dependence or light?

share|cite|improve this question
most likely yes – Arnold Neumaier Jul 23 '12 at 14:35
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Most likely, the 3 is an approximation to 2.99792458 (the number of meters light travels in 10 nanoseconds), as the boundaries of the wavelength perfectly fit the metric scheme.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 And this is completely right – Larry Harson Jul 23 '12 at 16:16
@LarryHarson: I agree, but you should be aware of the sqrt(10) business does fit with half-way logs. It's a coincidence of the speed of light in this case, but perhaps not elsewhere. – Ron Maimon Jul 23 '12 at 18:42

I believe it's just an approximation to 3.1623 (the square root of 10) which is what happens if you make a log-bin in base 10 and split it into regions which include powers of 10 with the most padding, so that you divide the log-region into 1.5-5.5, so that you are 100% sure where all the integer powers of 10, 1,2,3,4,5 go.

share|cite|improve this answer
It is far more likely to be just an approximation to 299,792,458 (the number of meters light travels in a second), as the boundaries of the wavelength perfectly fit the metric scheme. – Arnold Neumaier Jul 23 '12 at 14:37
@ArnoldNeumaier: Oh, maybe! That's a better answer--- why don't you post it. – Ron Maimon Jul 23 '12 at 14:51
-1 well this is completely wrong – Larry Harson Jul 23 '12 at 16:16
@LarryHarson: I agree, and it is good that you point it out. I would downvote my answer, but I can't. I don't want to delete it, because although it is wrong, I think it adds something to this question (although it's not that deep a question). – Ron Maimon Jul 24 '12 at 1:41

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.